इस प्रश्न का उत्तर दो

हैरी पॉटर सवाल

do u think it was necessary for Cedric Diggory to die off Goblet of Fire?

I was watching the film recently and i thought there was no real need for him to die, harry could of took the cup faced voldemort like so and everything would be the same dont u reckon
 do u think it was necessary for Cedric Diggory to die off Goblet of Fire?
 Ash24 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
next question »

हैरी पॉटर  सबसे अच्छा जवाब

marissa said:
No, Cedric didn't have to die, but that was sort of the point, I thought. We saw just how terrible Voldemort was, killing an innocent who just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
The end of Goblet of आग is really where the seris took a darker turn, I thought. It's where we start to realize exactly how horrible Voldemort and his followers are and how difficult it's going to be to defeat them.
If Cedric hadn't died, the only terrible things Voldemort would have done would have been in the past (well, at least in front of Harry). This way Harry, and the reader, really get to see how much of a bad guy he is and we want him gone just as much as Harry does.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
great explanation :)
kwlski4ever posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
Exactly. = D
friendsfan101 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
there's no better way to explain it than this ;)
petlover2009 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
next question »

जवाब

iandamonfan said:
Noooooo!!!!!!! I liked him!! And I'm not saying that because he eventually turned out to be Edward Culloen... I really liked him
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
niranjankale said:
YEAH!!!!!!!!!
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
kwlski4ever said:
It's important to Twi-hards.
Because , if Cedric didn't died in Goblet Of आग , Robert Pattison wouldn't be in Twilight xD
Just Kidding. xD
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
LOL. XD
friendsfan101 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
no its not inportant to twilight प्रशंसकों
bamagirl5899 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
hahah
isabellangel posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Ivonne26 said:
yeah, I think it was necessary because is like the representation that the things are getting worst thean ahead. In the first books, we see Voldemort evil as something that is far away, as a memory, but when Voldemort returns, that memory is now present everywhere, so Cedric death is a warning that the अगला पुस्तकें are gonna be sader.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
bamagirl5899 said:
no way
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
DiNozzosShorty said:
yes i hate him hes a butt
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
mmm he also has a small dick
Mongoose09 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
how do आप know?
halunik posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Joker1874 said:
CERTAINLY
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
Sweeney-Pie said:
As much as a Robert hater I am, I liked Cedric.
But, that's the thing, it showed आप that आप can grow so attached to a character and then the evils of Lord Voldemort can suck them away in no time!
Cedric's death was like a foreshadowing of the upcoming events. If it wasn't necessary for him to die, then apparently it wasn't necessary for anyone to. *shrug*
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
demoemo said:
idont think Cedric should have did he was cool .and harry thought he was awesome
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
i know, did आप know that Cedric was originally supposed to be in the Prefects bathroom with Harry but JK Rowling cut him out of the scene? he was supposed to fuck Harry hard up the नितंब, गधा and shove the golden egg up Harry's asshole
Mongoose09 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Sylarfan said:
I think its कूलर that he was killed!
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
bubbly_making said:
well, it would have meant the whole Harry/Cho thing couldn't happen it OOP, but I wouldn't have minded them missing THAT out to me. Its the only part of HP that really annoys me. It was mostly just to prove how evil voldermort was, like someones already said. It was also to get rid of a character who would have had no real further part in the story alive. He had और impact dead.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
vanillaicecream said:
Voldemort didn't want to have witnesses, if they had returned both alive, everybody at Hogwarts would believe Harry that Voldy had returned.
select as best answer
 [i] Voldemort didn't want to have witnesses, if they had returned both alive, everybody at Hogwarts would believe Harry that Voldy had returned. [/i]
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
StichxAngel4eva said:
yea. i wish Harry would just have taken the blinkin cup & gone to Voldy & stuff.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
next question »