इस प्रश्न का उत्तर दो

हैरी पॉटर सवाल

Im Confused! *Spoiler Alert*

If basilisk venom destroys horcruxes, then why didn't the bit of Voldemort in Harry die when he was stabbed with a basilisk fang?
 Face_of_Music posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
next question »

हैरी पॉटर जवाब

boolander25 said:
i'm pretty sure its because fawkes healed harry before the horcrux had the chance to die
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
ok, thx!
Face_of_Music posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
actually it was before harry himself had a chance to die... see my response for explanation
lilylunapotter6 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
dragonsmemory said:
The answer here is simple: Harry didn't die. Remember, a Horcrux casing has to be destroyed beyond all maggical repair to kill the bit of soul. In the case of a living Horcrux, death will do the trick, as no magic can reawaken the dead.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
OH! thx hun! i never thought of that!
Face_of_Music posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
No problem
dragonsmemory posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
:D
Face_of_Music posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
Two reasons, and they are simple.
lilylunapotter6 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
lilylunapotter6 said:
Two simple reasons.
One is that for Voldemort's soul piece to be forever destroyed, आप had to "kill" the horcrux द्वारा destroying the object containing it. Harry did not "die", so nor did the soul part. Also, (spoiler alert; don't know if आप have seen this movie sorry if आप haven't) in DH 2, when Dumbledore says that Harry must die, he means it. But not necessarily. When Voldemort kills Harry in the Forbidden Forest with the Avada Kedavra spell, and आप see that he is alive at King's पार करना, क्रॉस with Dumbledore, आप are like, "why isn't he dead?!" The answer is, he isn't dead because the spell didn't destroy him. It destroyed the soul piece inside of him. When Voldemort killed Lily Potter, the piece of his sould latched itself onto the first concealable living thing it could find-Harry himself, therefore making Harry the horcrux that Voldemort never meant to make, and he never knew it. when Voldy tries to kill Harry, he destroys the soul inside him instead. आप see, when the trio destroys the objects in order to kill the soul parts inside them, they do not actually destroy the objects themselves-just the soul. For example, when they stabbed the cup, the cup stayed a cup-the cup itself was not destroyed, merely the soul piece. so if Harry didn't "die" (Fawkes healed him quickly), niether would the Horcrux, and that is what happened in CoS.
select as best answer
 Two simple reasons. One is that for Voldemort's soul piece to be forever destroyed, आप had to "kill" the horcrux द्वारा destroying the object containing it. Harry did not "die", so nor did the soul part. Also, (spoiler alert; don't know if आप have seen this movie sorry if आप haven't) in DH 2, when Dumbledore says that Harry must die, he means it. But not necessarily. When Voldemort kills Harry in the Forbidden Forest with the Avada Kedavra spell, and आप see that he is alive at King's पार करना, क्रॉस with Dumbledore, आप are like, "why isn't he dead?!" The answer is, he isn't dead because the spell didn't destroy him. It destroyed the soul piece inside of him. When Voldemort killed Lily Potter, the piece of his sould latched itself onto the first concealable living thing it could find-Harry himself, therefore making Harry the horcrux that Voldemort never meant to make, and he never knew it. when Voldy tries to kill Harry, he destroys the soul inside him instead. आप see, when the trio destroys the objects in order to kill the soul parts inside them, they do not actually destroy the objects themselves-just the soul. For example, when they stabbed the cup, the cup stayed a cup-the cup itself was not destroyed, merely the soul piece. so if Harry didn't "die" (Fawkes healed him quickly), niether would the Horcrux, and that is what happened in CoS.
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
next question »