इस प्रश्न का उत्तर दो

Critical Analysis of Twilight सवाल

Sparkling Skin: Predator point of view?

OK, so not many people like the idea of a vampire sparkling. Sparkles = glitter = girly = fail. Not exactly sexy and manly and thrilling. But... Stephenie Meyer made her वैंपायर sparkle in order to attract prey. Their prey is humans, and what do humans tend to be attracted to? Beauty. Sparkles = oooh pretty = come closer. Possibly that's how Stephenie was thinking when she decided on their sparkly skin.
What do आप think? Are the sparkles understandable with this in mind? या do आप think 'nah, the वैंपायर are meant to be beautiful WITHOUT sparkling, so why glitter'?
*
Oh, forgot to say, sorry if this has already been asked!
HerMelody posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
I think its another delusional unfactual thing to lure in young girls. हे I प्यार glitter,but not on Vampires.
Flounder13 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
लोल yes xD
HerMelody posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
 HerMelody posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
next question »

Critical Analysis of Twilight जवाब

Asvini said:
Interesting idea. I can understand someone being ok with the sparkles on this basis.

It still doesn't work for me personally though. The Twilight वैंपायर are so overly powered. Just super strength alone would be enough to catch human prey, on चोटी, शीर्ष of that they have the speed, beauty and an assortment of additional powers such as mind reading. The addition of sparkles is so pointless. आप could take away a ton of their powers and hunting humans would be just as simple. There is something so unnecessary about the vast amount of powers they have.

Also, there's the fact that I don't think there's a time in history it would have worked. These days our reaction to sparkles has mostly been mockery so I see very few people being attracted to it (not to mention the amount of mundane explanations one could come up with for it these days, meaning it wouldn't even have the allure of being mysterious) and in the past people were और fearful of mythological creatures, and would probably be और likely to fear something visibly inhuman, so it seems like simply being attractive would be और helpful than the addition of sparkles in any era.
Finally, we have to assume their powers are to help them hunt. If not, simply being attractive would be enough and they'd need no other powers. As predators they need the ability to sneak up on things (not just humans, other predators that may be a threat such as the werewolves) and sparkles makes that impossible in दिन time. They would be unable to sneak up on या hide from any enemy, because of their beacon-like skin, a deadly hindrance for a predator. That's why real predators evolve the exact opposite of sparkles, camouflage, because it's a survival necessity. So to me sparkles not only add nothing helpful, they actually hold वैंपायर back.

That's just me though, not putting down your theory, या anyone who is ok with/a प्रशंसक of the sparkles :)
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
WELL SAID, Asvini! Very impressive.
LadyLilith posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
Great answer! I just wondered what people thought, as I was sitting and thinking about the whole 'sparkle to attract prey' thing, thought I'd ask what others think of it!
HerMelody posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
LadyLilith said:
I see what आप mean. But Asvini pretty much कहा everything I was going to say. I may also add that the वैंपायर in Twilight hide the fact that they sparkle from humans. So really, what was the point of them sparkling?
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
Another good point -_-' hmmm there are big flaws to these sparkles.
HerMelody posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
There are big flaws to the Twilight series in general. I apologize if you're a fan, but that's how I see it. :/
LadyLilith posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
I agree about the flaws in Twilight. Still, it's a light read that I can get into without taking it seriously या thinking too much about it lol. Sometimes it's nice to just sit down and read some nonsense, and being a Jacob and भेड़िया प्रशंसक helps.
HerMelody posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Phoebe_Gabriel said:
Hmmm let me think for a minute...
Ok so वैंपायर that sparkle... I don't think that this helps a predator very much. आप see वैंपायर are attractive in their own way, they have extreme beauty, intriguing personallity, dark nature and not to mention superspeed and superstrength and only the first 3 are enough to draw a young girl in order to feed from her. There isn't that much dark in a vampire that sparkles-sorry if I offended anyone- Meyer made her वैंपायर not being able to resist human blood and when they taste it they can't stop drinking until they have drained the victim dry. But वैंपायर tend to satisfy their victims before killing them and not doing that including glittering kinda freaks out. And also if they want to hunt during the दिन glittering prevents them because they don't want to be exposed... but if it its like that then why do they glitter? Sparkling is और of a burden rather than a weapon.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
Sorry I guess this is a little complicating...
Phoebe_Gabriel posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
I know exactly what आप mean Phoebe_Gabriel!
HerMelody posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
MadamOcta13 said:
I always thought-no, wait, it always has been that वैंपायर attracted their prey through hypnosis. NO GLITTER NEEDED!
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
Cola020 said:
The Salvatores are real vampires!
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
tdafan121 said:
The only thing that would lure in is an idiot. No offence to anyone या anything.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
ork100 said:
I would like to think this is और complex than that. Could it be that the लेखक was thinking about how वैंपायर are immortal? Perhaps something in their cells has crystallized and that is what preserves them या whatever is in their tissues that stops decay is reflective. Sunlight causes damage to molecules, perhaps it is built in very effective suntan lotion. वैंपायर are meant to have demons inside them and Lucifer comes from the latin for light, perhaps it is their demonic side sparkling. Lots of fun possibilities that go beyond being pretty and glittery. I did think the scene in the film was rubbish, seriously sparkly required.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
I pretty sure Meyer would have hinted towards something of that kind in the books, but good argument.
Aqua_Rose posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Aqua_Rose said:
Personally, I don't think people would be attracted to the sparkles, simply because although sparkles are pretty, and enchanting, and attractive, on a living creature, particularly on a creature that is supposed to look at least vaguely human, would be rather distressing and confusing, and people are probably और than likely to either attack it या run away, both of which are in vain against a vampire. So, after that ridiculously long sentence (sorry, it's a habit of mine), I agree that the sparkling is completely unnecessary- particularly as वैंपायर are notoriously hunters of the NIGHT, and so their sparkles in the daylight would not necessarily be seen द्वारा their prey.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
Book-Freak said:
I don't think they sparkle to attract prey - I think it's an effect of the transformation. In the Illustrated Guide, it says this:

'In direct sunlight, the disparity between humans and वैंपायर becomes और obvious. The cellular membrane of the vampire is not as soft या permeable as in a human cell; it has crystalline properties that cause the surface of vampire skin to react prismatically, giving the vampire a glitter-like shimmer in sunlight.'

So the effect of the venom in the transformation upon the human cells is the reason for the sparkling.

Also, I think they make the sparkling और noticeable in the movies. After पढ़ना the meadow scene, I visualized the sparkling as और of a soft glimmer.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
Haha, I put far too much time into thinking about that so nice to know I was on the right track. I'm not a twilight प्रशंसक so haven't read the पुस्तकें but I was a vampire प्रशंसक in my teens, Anne चावल though, so when I saw that bit in the film it sent the grey cells ticking. It's good that the लेखक has come up with new ideas, boring when something made up gets to be dogma.
ork100 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
next question »