What do you think? Place your vote!
(Placed your vote already? Remember to login!)

डम्बल्डोर की फौज Do आप wish there had been Slytherins im Dumbledore Army?

60 fans picked:
Yes Dumbledore Army should been about house unity
   63%
No Slytherins are dodgy and wouldn't been ब्रेव enough to शामिल होइए Dumbledore Army
   37%
 TangoThang posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Make your pick! | next poll >>
save

10 comments

user photo
Pith picked Yes Dumbledore Army should been about house unity:
It always bugged me that JKR insisted that being in Slytherin didn't make you "bad", yet hardly ever showed examples of Slytherin students being "good".
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना.
 
user photo
Mongoose09 picked Yes Dumbledore Army should been about house unity:
But I do understand why there weren't any there. The house, in general, just has too much pride for that. I don't think any self-respecting Slytherin would want to be caught dead in a club called "Dumbledore's Army" run by the boy who lived, a blood traitor and a mudblood. The other Slytherins would make their life hell when they found out.
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना.
last edited एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
 
user photo
LadyNottingham picked Yes Dumbledore Army should been about house unity:
It would have been nice indeed but not very realistic, as Mongoose explained. Besides, the Inquisitorial Squad had a strong appeal to Slytherins - gaining extra points, etc. But yes, having some Slytherins that could have managed to hide their membership to the DA quite well, would have been interesting. A real challenge for their cunning. After all, there was Severus in the Order and Horace was one of these Slytherins that were not prejudiced.
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना.
 
user photo
romioneisthekey picked Yes Dumbledore Army should been about house unity:
Not all Slytherins have to be evil; Slytherins are about ambition, not selfishness. Sometimes, their ambitions require them to be selfish, that's why they can be really mean. I really support House Unity, and it would be really great if Jo Rowling made in least 1 or 2 Slytherins in Dumbledore's Army. It was too bad that all the Slytherins in the book were evil (for the ones that went to Hogwarts at Harry's time).
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना.
 
user photo
FurbaLyoko picked No Slytherins are dodgy and wouldn't been ब्रेव enough to शामिल होइए Dumbledore Army:
Has anyone seen good Slytherins? Not saying all are bad I just wondering if any are good?
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना.
 
user photo
MoonshoesPerry picked Yes Dumbledore Army should been about house unity:
Snape, Slughorn (even if he can be a bit of a prat), Regulus (once he saw the errors of his ways). There are probably others, I just can think of any at the moment.
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना.
 
user photo
rebecaleia picked No Slytherins are dodgy and wouldn't been ब्रेव enough to शामिल होइए Dumbledore Army:
Never.
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना.
 
user photo
Flickerflame picked No Slytherins are dodgy and wouldn't been ब्रेव enough to शामिल होइए Dumbledore Army:
I couldn't see any of the pre-existing DA members trusting them enough to tell them or invite them. And a lot of Slytherins would see telling Umbridge as serving their ambition.
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना.
 
user photo
Hades_Shadow picked Yes Dumbledore Army should been about house unity:
My thoughts on the subject is their ambition to prove they are not evil would prompt one or two Slytherin's to join. I feel it would be also something they would take pride in.
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना.
 
user photo
LowriLorenza89 picked No Slytherins are dodgy and wouldn't been ब्रेव enough to शामिल होइए Dumbledore Army:
I like the idea in theory of a handful of Slytherins rebelling by joining the DA, in the same way you have Slughorn and Snape defying Voldemort. But in practice it wouldn't have worked.
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना.