What if...

What if The Beatles wouldn't split, and stay together 'till today, do आप think John and George could still be alive?
 What if...
 MJforever8 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
next question »

द बीटल्स जवाब

megann1992 said:
No.
Mark David Chapman was out to get John. Even if John had been living in England, Chapman most likely would've found a way to get there.
George would still die from cancer.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
juicyjossy9 said:
Most probably ... if George would have stopped smoking way earlier and if John wouldn't have lived in New York ... but every living being's life unfurls as it must, so ...
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
beatles1fan said:
I think that George will still have died because he still would have had cancer. That is kind of inevitable. John may have still been alive if he would have had a body guard, या epic ninja skills to dodge the bullet(s).
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
आप made me lough!! <3
MJforever8 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
आप are quite welcome for the laugh.
beatles1fan posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
i bet आप he would have epic ninja skills.
vAmPiReNiNjA45 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
fugiami said:
no. unless george had stopped smoking, he still would of gotten the cancer. and john's killer was going to get him no matter what. so no, they wouldnt still be alive today.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
WakkoWarnerLuv said:
I think George would have but that dumb guy that killed John may still have got him :0( Poor John. And Georgie. I likes thems.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
tellymaster said:
I think John probably would still be alive. A reason for their break up was Yoko Ono, so he might have not been so into war and peace and stuff. Oh well. Who knows. Another is musical differences, but that's aside the point.
George? I think he would've died all the same. He died of lung cancer, so आप can't really stop that, even if they didn't break up. Just because the Beatles didn't (in a fantasy) break up, it doesn't mean he would have stopped smoking.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
i agree :)
MJforever8 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
TrueHufflepuff said:
Hmmm... I dunno. But I hope so!!!
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
GoldenMagikarp said:
no, no they would not ):
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
vAmPiReNiNjA45 said:
if the Beatles wouldn't have broken up, they wouldn't be the Beatles we know today. the reason they're the greatest band in history is because of the amazing things they did in such a short amount of time. if the Beatles didn't break up, no. they would not be alive. nothing could have changed that. but it wouldn't have been as tragic because the novelty would have defiantly worn off. and they would not have been able to make solo albums therefore they would not be remembered for that. at least not John. and when John died they would obviously have to break up the band. so they wouldn't be a band when George died. anyway what I'm trying to get at is आप can praise the Beatles for the amazing stuff they did, but that doesn't even matter when you're talking about this. what matters is how long they were together. that's the real amazement. so yeah. it would have changed the career. but not in that way.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
sorry. i got carried away. and off topic.
vAmPiReNiNjA45 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
I really don't know why anyone would think that, if the Beatles had stayed together, their संगीत wouldn't have been as good. I mean, the very fact that they released solo albums proves that the संगीत was still in them, and those songs were really good and would only have been better with all four of them playing on them. It wasn't the Beatles' musical talent that ended when they did; it was their friendship. And that's just too sad to be allowed.
Rubyrings posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Rubyrings said:
John would still be alive, because he wouldn't have been in the same place at the same time, but most important, he'd have his mates there to protect him, like Ringo did in Help! George, unfortunately, I don't see how we could save him unless he'd never started smoking.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
ktichenor said:
No, staying together wouldn't have stopped that deranged idiot from killing John Lennon and George Harrison died of cancer so unfortunately I don't think it would've been possible . :(
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
ChiliPepperLuv said:
Maybe, maybe not. The Beatles splitting had nothing to do with their deaths. Like Rubyrings said, though. John और than likely would have had his band mates to save him from getting shot. I don't think George could have been saved from cancer. Anybody can get cancer.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
The only way I can think of that the Beatles staying together could have saved George is if they'd done another movie, in which a bunch of health nuts are after Ringo, maybe then he'd get all into health and he'd still be alive.
Rubyrings posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
next question »