इस प्रश्न का उत्तर दो

बिना सोचे समझे सवाल

If आप had to chose between being stoic towards everything and being emotional towards everything, which one would आप choose?

 CokeTheUmbreon posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
next question »

बिना सोचे समझे जवाब

cosmic_fusions said:
i could never be stoic
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
^Me neither. Glad I'm not the only one 'round here who gets emotional (from time to time).
BJsRealm posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
zanhar1 said:
Stoic.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
BJsRealm said:
I don't know. I'm way too emotional myself. I often act on impulse, regretting everything the very अगला second. People think that I'm cold, heartless & calculated, without any human emotions whatsoever. Believe me, nothing could be further from the truth in my case! Thank God I'm a pacifist myself. What can I say, sometimes it's best to keep your feelings to yourself, on some other occasions, it's best to let everyone know exactly how आप feel at the moment. Guess आप can say it all depends on the situation. That's not much of an answer, I know, but it's the best possible answer I could come up with on such short notice. Hope आप like it.
select as best answer
 I don't know. I'm way too emotional myself. I often act on impulse, regretting everything the very अगला second. People think that I'm cold, heartless & calculated, without any human emotions whatsoever. Believe me, nothing could be further from the truth in my case! Thank God I'm a pacifist myself. What can I say, sometimes it's best to keep your feelings to yourself, on some other occasions, it's best to let everyone know exactly how आप feel at the moment. Guess आप can say it all depends on the situation. That's not much of an answer, I know, but it's the best possible answer I could come up with on such short notice. Hope आप like it.
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
SilentForce said:
Stoic
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
BlindBandit92 said:
Stoic
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
EgoMouse said:
Considering I can be extremes on both side, I would say both sides have fucked me over and I rather just be neutral with a hint of emotional.
....But I guess और stoic.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
Lavendergolden said:
I guess stoic. I sure am a bit of an emotional person, but I want tog get hurt lesser
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
Ranty-cat said:
In philosophy, while stoicism is और about resilience and logic, it doesn’t imply emotionlessness at all.

It is emotional control in it's highest form. It is not that one does not feel pain but is the fact that they can control their sense of it या their emotional and physical reaction to it making them appear emotionless.

In this context, if your definition of the term stoic is merely "emotionless", and आप are using it synonymously, then my answer would be I would rather be emotional because the world will feel hollow once आप lose all of your emotions. आप will neither feel the positive emotions, nor the negative ones. I want to feel and experience all those beautiful moments and feelings and many events that made me feel so happy and different range of emotions that I am glad that I had. I'd rather have emotions and learn how to control them instead of not having any emotions at all.


select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
Nick3600 said:
wtf is stoic? is that how a stroke victim says the word stroke? It would be pretty inconvenient if i got a stroke just द्वारा looking at everything
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
next question »