WHY DOES EVERYONE HATE THE MOVIE?

I प्यार the movie and I don't know why every one hates it . Sometimes in a movie they have got to leave things out and if it was the length of the book it would last for hours. Can someone pleassse answer this सवाल
 Iamadragon posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
next question »

एरागोन  सबसे अच्छा जवाब

bookworm101 said:
I hated it because,

1. Brom is not a storyteller.

2. एरागोन doesn't seem to have any weaknesses in the movie, unlike the book. It makes characters seem और real when they have weaknesses.

3. Arya was BLOND, and she had ROUND ears.

4. एरागोन was not injured at the end when he defeated Durza, which plays a huge part in Eldest.

5. ORIK WAS NON-EXISTENT!!!
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
voted u as best answer! ur so rite, and i totally forgot his Durza injury... wow. they really CAN'T do a second! wat losers. how r they qualified as filmmakers?
louisianababe posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
ditto
bookworm101 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
yep, not to mention that whole "if the rider dies, then the dragon will die because of it" thing is totally BS. I kinda get where they got that from (since they usually go insane/suicidal), but regardless, it wasn't in the book and they state it right out in the movie e.0
mossears133 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
next question »

जवाब

green79 said:
Most of the people who hate the movie are the ones who have read the book. I think the reason why is because they see what an amazing book एरागोन is (although it's a copy of Lord of the Rings) and then they see how crappy the movie is compared to the book and they hate it because if it had just followed the book और it could have been amazing.

I saw the movie before I read the book and I liked it. Then I read the book a couple years later and loved it but when I watched the movie again I realized how much better the book was. The movie could have been amazing like the Lord of the Rings but instead they completely changed it and messed it up so that it skipped और than half of the book.
So I think that's why a lot of people hate the movie but correct me if I'm wrong.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
One और thing, eragonfan10... I think the reason why everyone compares it to the Lord of the Rings is because the book is almost just as good as it and I think that a lot of people were hoping for great फिल्में like the Lord of the Rings but then this crappy movie comes out that is completely different from the book... I think that's why.
green79 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
एरागोन is not like lord of the rings
aryaluver posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
Ummm.... Vader was manipulated द्वारा Palpatine. I didn't really compare it before someone mentioned it, but it kinda is. And Morzan is Eragon's father. I think. I haven't read it in about a year. या watched the mocie, but I don;'t think it's in the movie.
Icepaw_Kenobi posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Okami_Amaterasu said:
Because of how unlike the book it was, there was nothing in the film that made me think this is a good comparison to the book, everything was wrong in the movie, and the movie was short, but they didn't have to do about the whole book, they left out important things, that affect the सेकंड book aswell, so if they do a सेकंड movie (I doubt it) it wouldn't be Eldest, they might aswell give it a diffrent name.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
thanx for answering
Iamadragon posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
Orik wasn't evn in ther, so they cant do a second, cuz Orik is really important and major in that book.
louisianababe posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
anexskater said:
The reason i didn't like this movie was because they left a bunch of city's in the movie and also,they had Arya black haired and also whats the deal with Arya, isn't she supposed to have pointed ears?. Also what gets me ticked is that एरागोन fights Durza in the dwarf kingdom were the dragon lair i s(sorry frogot the name of the dwarf fortress)not in the air!?.So man ythings were left out making आप think i your really watching एरागोन , या some cheesy dragon movie. Also i think that why harry potter is so poplar in movies? because the directors are British and so is the cast. Sadly,American directors like to twist the story.They like to run away with their imagination and never come back, leaving the लेखक silently fuming.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
YES YES YES!!!I totaly agree!!!
emmaterry posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
nickbrownmusic2 said:
Because these books, while they have been called slightly amateur द्वारा some, are insanely insightful and well imagined द्वारा someone so young. Some of the concepts introduced द्वारा oromis' teachings are just beautiful and as a whole the पुस्तकें actually manage to standalone in terms of originality, despite what the LOTR bashers say. In terms of this type of fiction, its hard not to write something that has been done in some way before, its about dragons, magic and evil ffs, of course its been written about before. But Paolini STILL managed to write something that stands alone and is memorable and captivating. Now to the question....to have that movie come from these पुस्तकें is f*&#en disgusting. Not because its not accurate (which it bloody well ISNT! in the SLIGHTEST!), but because films are GENERALLY going to be seen द्वारा the masses और so than the minority who would rather read it and it absolutely puts Paolini to shame. I feel so bad for him hearing people see the movie and hate on it (as well they should) because they see it as a reflection on his work, which it barely is. The movie should never have been made. If आप cant do it properly then just don't do it, it is an insult to the पुस्तकें and one that tarnishes their memory forever. Oh and also, orcs aren't like urgals at all. AT. ALL...and if आप think they are then even Tolkien (god rest his soul) would be shaking his head in disgust at you, urgals are like Beorn, if anything. They aren't evil AND THEY ARENT WHAT THE GODDAMN STUPID MOVIE MADE THEM AS! THEY DIDNT EVEN HAVE HORNS!.....god I hate it so much I cant even deal with it. If I ever see the filmmakers on the beat...Jierda theirra kalfis! Im so heartbroken for आप Paolini, we प्यार ya shurt'ugal x
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
bookworm12345 said:
the movie was so far off from the book and it sucked
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
Thanx for answering as well
Iamadragon posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
well it was
bookworm12345 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
eragonfan10 said:
Im with आप lama...I like the movie, even though some of the dialogue was corny. It doesn't matter to me how much unlike the book it is. Also,I doubt this movie had the incredible monetary backing that Lord of the Rings had in which they actually could afford to put every page of the book into a very LOOOOONG movie...And yet people unfairly compare everything to Lord of the Rings. I think this movie had it where it counts, a good story, character, and even heart. I really want to see this series continue on the big screen.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
It's good to see that someone likes it as well no disrespect to anyone who hates it everyone has a different liking या hating of it
Iamadragon posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
but they left important things out and screwed the caracters up. If they did the movie right i wouldn't mind it being और then one movie या a long one. To make it worse they can't do the सेकंड book या the third now
Tsuki posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
आप need to lay off "Lord of the Rings"! It is the best movie/book series of all time! UNDERSTAND!?
selena-kun posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
chickens_rule said:
Because it sucks compared to the books. The movie has a completely different stroy line to the पुस्तकें because they changed it soooooo much!!!!!!
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
aryaluver said:
i dont hate it i lovee it its so goooooooooood
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
but i agreey the book is way better than the movie
aryaluver posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
movie sucks.
emmaterry posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
louisianababe said:
wow,lamadragon, how in the hell ru an एरागोन प्रशंसक if u प्यार the movie???? it was HORRIBLE. the worst. nothing was right. not evn going to go into the details. did u read the book at all? i guess not, cuz that movie really p-oed me. read the book, then watch the movie. thats all im gonna say.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
AnimationFan said:
Saphira looked great, but that's pretty much it. Angela was a short curled haird women in the book, but in the film she was (meant to be) pretty with jewls like an ordinary fortune teller.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
eragon123 said:
Because the movie was almost nothing compared to the book and it wrapped up the entire series even though the 4th book isnt even out yet
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
kenziepopper said:
? Nobody likes the movie?!! I प्यार the movie and the video game. even if some things are different it is still a good movie.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
no
emmaterry posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
^It's an opinion, not a fact. Your "no" doesn't even make sense.
ArcticWolf posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
i-luv-jazz-hale said:
people dont like it because the director/producer/peopel cut and changed it so much. half the things which would be important in the अगला three पुस्तकें where cut out. they got the ending wrong. they should re-do it.
and what about the crazy witch child. i forgot her name but she is important
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
The witch childs name is elva
emmaterry posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
BuddyBu said:
the movie is pretty good, but I dont like it as much as the पुस्तकें coz of:

1. Durza kills Brom in the movie, but its supposed to be the ra'zac

2. Saphira does the really retarted growing up all of a sudden

3. एरागोन doesn't दिखाना the traders the stone

4. Orik isn't in it

5. Arya has red hair in the movie and round ears, when she should have black hair and pointy ears

There is a lot more!!
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
Arya should also have green eyes.has the director ever thout of eye cotacts???
emmaterry posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
Don't forget the shade never had a smoke dragon in the movie and his smoke dragon never bit saphira on her neck and the urgal's had horns and there were no kull in the movie too.
Canylib2746 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
joejonasislove said:
I really liked the movie but maybe it's cause I haven't read the पुस्तकें :/
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
आप havent read the books!?Why are आप at thins प्रशंसक club?
emmaterry posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
because i like the movie :/
joejonasislove posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
OMG!!
luvmurtagh33 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
erlina41 said:
I actually प्यार the movie but the book was kinda better..
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
Kind of better?! The book is amazing compared to the film!
Okami_Amaterasu posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
yes, the movie was crap compared to the book!!!
luvmurtagh33 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
The book was 100 times better then the movie.
Canylib2746 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Tsuki said:
the movie is screwed up and is nothing like the book and what is suposed to b like the book is wrong. They couldn't even get a elf या a uragal right.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
Elizabeth0 said:
I actually प्यार the movie. I think that, as a movie, it wasn't so bad at all.
If we want to compare it with the book, it's completley different story. But they couldn't make a movie and keep everything from the book. Even Peter Jackson couldn't do that in trilogy LOTR.
Only thing I don't like is the fact that Saphira grows really fast in the movie, and it just doesn't go that way. They should've done a movie with और baby Saphira scenes. She was so adorable. And Murthagh. Garrett was cute in that movie.
lol
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
Ummmmm...
emmaterry posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
adieee said:
i'm with आप lama, i loved the movie, i don't really care that dialogue(sp?) wasn't in it, but i do think that the book was better
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
hannah_vampire said:
i dont i प्यार the पुस्तकें and the movie. they are both kool
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
selena-kun said:
Because Stupid 20th century लोमड़ी, फॉक्स messed it up so that the only simelaritys were the names and the whole Riders thing.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
Icepaw_Kenobi said:
I don't hate the movie as a movie, but compared to the book there are almost no similarities. And I think the book is better. And it does kinda seem like it copies off of other movies. The book doesn't, but the movie does. I really loved the book and the movie seperatly, though.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
kosgun said:
alot of things were left out wicth sucked
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
luvmurtagh33 said:
Dude, have आप read the book?? The movie is crap compared to the book.1.The appearance of the characters was totally wrong 2. The events were mixed up and tons of them were missed out 3.Eragon had to name Saphira ( who had feathers!!! wtf!!)not she to tell him her name and they skipped off to a strong bond right away and it was not like that!!

So many things were wrong , they cannot make a sequel unless they make up a whole new story!!
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
bob45678 said:
It's nothing like the book. एरागोन never got captured, या meet Orik, and Arya doesn't leave in the end of the book. The book was so much better, and since the movie wasn't like the book at all, people don't like it.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
next question »