इस प्रश्न का उत्तर दो

वाद-विवाद सवाल

Is freedom best?

आप choose, I go for freedom! Are आप for या against?
 JaydaJadie posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
next question »

वाद-विवाद जवाब

whiteflame55 said:
It depends how to define freedom. I like freedom, I think freedom is important as a general standard, but I'm not so sure I'd very it as best. Freedom leads people to do some very crazy things, and has led plenty of countries to ruin. Freedom, in its purest form, is anarchy. It's a good idea as long as the freedoms of each individual are respected, but that is rarely the case. I'd say I'm "for" freedom in most cases, but not all.

But आप asked if its best. Why is equality not best? In its purest form, equality ensures that everyone is treated the same. There are harms to that system as well, but in doing so, no one feels oppressed to the whims of others. We could talk about the importance of justice, another strong value that allows an individual to feel that their voice is always heard. These are important values as well, and there are plenty और than I'm simply not coming up with at the moment. Why should freedom be considered best?
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
Thanks for the info whiteflame!
JaydaJadie posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Book-Freak said:
It depends really. The problem with complete freedom is that it allows people to do whatever they want with no restrictions whatsoever. They can justify anything. So आप have to have laws to protect people, which means आप don't have complete freedom. Then it can go to the extreme that governments will be able to justify things that usually would be seen as breaking the right to privacy with the excuse that they are trying to protect the people. For example, think of all the things Edward Snowden blew the whistle on in the US.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
next question »