Ok, here I go. First, I wanna apologize for my English, because it's quite bad (I'm Russian).
I was really impressed (in a bad way) द्वारा the टिप्पणियाँ most of Spike haters make all over the internet. All of those टिप्पणियाँ seem to be very alike: "Spike was bad, while एंजल was good". I could never understand this statement. Let's see:
We have two soulless vampires. Angelus and Spike. They both where bad. Yes. वैंपायर are bad. Sorry, Stephenie Mayer. But even soulless Spike had और humanity than soulless Angel: when Angelus became a vampire, he killed all his family, while Spike tried to save his...
continue reading...
