Ok, here I go. First, I wanna apologize for my English, because it's quite bad (I'm Russian).
I was really impressed (in a bad way) द्वारा the टिप्पणियाँ most of Spike haters make all over the internet. All of those टिप्पणियाँ seem to be very alike: "Spike was bad, while एंजल was good". I could never understand this statement. Let's see:
We have two soulless vampires. Angelus and Spike. They both where bad. Yes. वैंपायर are bad. Sorry, Stephenie Mayer. But even soulless Spike had और humanity than soulless Angel: when Angelus became a vampire, he killed all his family, while Spike tried to save his...
I've recently been looking on बिना सोचे समझे websites for लेखाए about BTVS, just to read other people's opinions. I've found out it just isn't a great thing for me to do, as I find myself so worked up द्वारा people dissing Spike's character, stressing him as the major element in the downfall of BTVS.