Ok, here I go. First, I wanna apologize for my English, because it's quite bad (I'm Russian).
I was really impressed (in a bad way) द्वारा the टिप्पणियाँ most of Spike haters make all over the internet. All of those टिप्पणियाँ seem to be very alike: "Spike was bad, while एंजल was good". I could never understand this statement. Let's see:
We have two soulless vampires. Angelus and Spike. They both where bad. Yes. वैंपायर are bad. Sorry, Stephenie Mayer. But even soulless Spike had और humanity than soulless Angel: when Angelus became a vampire, he killed all his family, while Spike tried to save his mother द्वारा turning her, because she was sick. Spike took care of Dru and loved her to pieces while Angelus awfully treated Darla. Now lets see what Angelus did to Buffy: he used a psychological terror on her, he killed Jenny, he tortured Giles, he tried to kill Buffy's mom (a person Buffy loved और than anyone in this world) while soulless Spike tried to protect Dawn even if it could coast him life. Soulless Spike let Glory torture him and was ready to die just not to "leave Buffy in pain". Buffy could have never known about his sacrifice if he had died during the torture. Soulless Spike took care of Dawn even after Buffy's death, because he promised her that. A soulless vampire keeps a promise दिया to a slayer. Buffy's dead, no one to impress. But he still keeps his promise. And it had nothing to do with his chip. Can आप imagine Angelus act like this, even if he had a chip?
Can आप imagine what could have happened if Glory had caught Angelus instead of Spike? Angelus would have probably told everything he knew about Buffy's life, helped Glory to kill Buffy's family and then Buffy herself... And no way Angelus would ever fight to death to bring his soul back for the one he loves. Anyway, soulless एंजल caused Buffy so much pain that soulless Spike didn't even come close to.
Why do some people use things soulless Spike did against Spike with a soul? Same people don't use all those terrible things Angelus did against एंजल या Bangel. Why? Because एंजल had two names? Should we call soulless Spike "Spikelus" then?..
Spike and Spuffy haters always use an attempted rape in Season 6 against Spike fans. Again, in season 6 it was soulless Spike. A soulless vampire ALMOST did a bad thing yet stopped, went to fight to death to get his soul back and did everything to gain Buffy's forgiveness. Spike haters say: "What a monster!" एंजल with a soul slitted his son's throat and refused of his own child, because this child had mental problems he couldn't deal with. Spike haters say: "What a hero!" They say that एंजल did it "for his son's sake". Really? It's an excuse all the bad fathers use for ages. The worst thing was that only a couple of hours after that एंजल goes to Sunnydale and seems to be all joky and jealousy and looks like he only cared about Buffy dating या not dating Spike...
Spike was horrified द्वारा the fact that he could "hurt a girl", he went hell knows where and fought to death to bring his soul back. The only vampire in history who did that. And did this for the one he loved. In season 3 when एंजल was hurt द्वारा a poisoned ऐरो and only slayer's blood could cure him, Buffy only had to एक प्रकार का जहाज़ him a couple of times due to get him angry and he was totally out of control. एंजल with a soul had nearly killed Buffy द्वारा drinking her blood. And he didn't stop like soulles Spike.
एंजल with a soul let Darla and Dru kill people. एंजल with a soul headed Wolfram and Hart and communicated with demons who killed innocent. No way एंजल was ever better than Spike.
I don't hate एंजल (he's one of my प्रिय characters and I'm a very big प्रशंसक of David Boreanaz), but what I really can't stand is double standards.
Another thing Spike haters use against soulful Spike is that he didn't say sorry for killing Robin Wood's mother. (By the way, एंजल wasn't that sorry about Jenny and he didn't stand on his neas bagging Giles to forgive him for killing the प्यार of his life). Spike was a vampire, Wood's mom was a slayer. They fought, he won. It was a honest fight. Wood though had all the rights to ask for revenge. But instead of अभिनय like a man and fighting Spike on his own, he asks Giles to distract Buffy and then uses Spike's trigger to fulfill his plan. I'm not even gonna remind everyone that Wood tried to stake Spike in his back once during the fight at school. Very manly. His mother should be proud...
I also don't get why Spike haters and a lot of Bangel प्रशंसकों (those who also are Spike haters. Thanks Merlin, not all the Bangel प्रशंसकों are Spike haters...) are all praying on what Giles कहा in Season 7 about एंजल doing the right thing द्वारा leaving Buffy and Sunnydale (in season 3)? Giles in Season 7 and especially in that episode was shown as a person, who makes a HUGE mistake. I प्यार Giles, but not in that episode. Those people are praying on someone who gave all that pro-Bangel speech only to distract Buffy to give Wood a chance to kill Spike... Can आप imagine what would they say if it was एंजल Wood needed to kill and Giles would say something good about Spike to distract Buffy? I can almost hear their angry screams: "Giles must die!"
So, what do we have? Double standards. None of this वैंपायर was perfect. None of all the BTVS characters was perfect. They all had good and bad sides of their character. But double standards are always bad, there's nothing good about them...
I was really impressed (in a bad way) द्वारा the टिप्पणियाँ most of Spike haters make all over the internet. All of those टिप्पणियाँ seem to be very alike: "Spike was bad, while एंजल was good". I could never understand this statement. Let's see:
We have two soulless vampires. Angelus and Spike. They both where bad. Yes. वैंपायर are bad. Sorry, Stephenie Mayer. But even soulless Spike had और humanity than soulless Angel: when Angelus became a vampire, he killed all his family, while Spike tried to save his mother द्वारा turning her, because she was sick. Spike took care of Dru and loved her to pieces while Angelus awfully treated Darla. Now lets see what Angelus did to Buffy: he used a psychological terror on her, he killed Jenny, he tortured Giles, he tried to kill Buffy's mom (a person Buffy loved और than anyone in this world) while soulless Spike tried to protect Dawn even if it could coast him life. Soulless Spike let Glory torture him and was ready to die just not to "leave Buffy in pain". Buffy could have never known about his sacrifice if he had died during the torture. Soulless Spike took care of Dawn even after Buffy's death, because he promised her that. A soulless vampire keeps a promise दिया to a slayer. Buffy's dead, no one to impress. But he still keeps his promise. And it had nothing to do with his chip. Can आप imagine Angelus act like this, even if he had a chip?
Can आप imagine what could have happened if Glory had caught Angelus instead of Spike? Angelus would have probably told everything he knew about Buffy's life, helped Glory to kill Buffy's family and then Buffy herself... And no way Angelus would ever fight to death to bring his soul back for the one he loves. Anyway, soulless एंजल caused Buffy so much pain that soulless Spike didn't even come close to.
Why do some people use things soulless Spike did against Spike with a soul? Same people don't use all those terrible things Angelus did against एंजल या Bangel. Why? Because एंजल had two names? Should we call soulless Spike "Spikelus" then?..
Spike and Spuffy haters always use an attempted rape in Season 6 against Spike fans. Again, in season 6 it was soulless Spike. A soulless vampire ALMOST did a bad thing yet stopped, went to fight to death to get his soul back and did everything to gain Buffy's forgiveness. Spike haters say: "What a monster!" एंजल with a soul slitted his son's throat and refused of his own child, because this child had mental problems he couldn't deal with. Spike haters say: "What a hero!" They say that एंजल did it "for his son's sake". Really? It's an excuse all the bad fathers use for ages. The worst thing was that only a couple of hours after that एंजल goes to Sunnydale and seems to be all joky and jealousy and looks like he only cared about Buffy dating या not dating Spike...
Spike was horrified द्वारा the fact that he could "hurt a girl", he went hell knows where and fought to death to bring his soul back. The only vampire in history who did that. And did this for the one he loved. In season 3 when एंजल was hurt द्वारा a poisoned ऐरो and only slayer's blood could cure him, Buffy only had to एक प्रकार का जहाज़ him a couple of times due to get him angry and he was totally out of control. एंजल with a soul had nearly killed Buffy द्वारा drinking her blood. And he didn't stop like soulles Spike.
एंजल with a soul let Darla and Dru kill people. एंजल with a soul headed Wolfram and Hart and communicated with demons who killed innocent. No way एंजल was ever better than Spike.
I don't hate एंजल (he's one of my प्रिय characters and I'm a very big प्रशंसक of David Boreanaz), but what I really can't stand is double standards.
Another thing Spike haters use against soulful Spike is that he didn't say sorry for killing Robin Wood's mother. (By the way, एंजल wasn't that sorry about Jenny and he didn't stand on his neas bagging Giles to forgive him for killing the प्यार of his life). Spike was a vampire, Wood's mom was a slayer. They fought, he won. It was a honest fight. Wood though had all the rights to ask for revenge. But instead of अभिनय like a man and fighting Spike on his own, he asks Giles to distract Buffy and then uses Spike's trigger to fulfill his plan. I'm not even gonna remind everyone that Wood tried to stake Spike in his back once during the fight at school. Very manly. His mother should be proud...
I also don't get why Spike haters and a lot of Bangel प्रशंसकों (those who also are Spike haters. Thanks Merlin, not all the Bangel प्रशंसकों are Spike haters...) are all praying on what Giles कहा in Season 7 about एंजल doing the right thing द्वारा leaving Buffy and Sunnydale (in season 3)? Giles in Season 7 and especially in that episode was shown as a person, who makes a HUGE mistake. I प्यार Giles, but not in that episode. Those people are praying on someone who gave all that pro-Bangel speech only to distract Buffy to give Wood a chance to kill Spike... Can आप imagine what would they say if it was एंजल Wood needed to kill and Giles would say something good about Spike to distract Buffy? I can almost hear their angry screams: "Giles must die!"
So, what do we have? Double standards. None of this वैंपायर was perfect. None of all the BTVS characters was perfect. They all had good and bad sides of their character. But double standards are always bad, there's nothing good about them...