इस प्रश्न का उत्तर दो

पर्सी जैक्सन एंड द ओलम्पियंस सवाल

do आप think that they have already messed up the moive?

 aquamoon posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
next question »

पर्सी जैक्सन एंड द ओलम्पियंस जवाब

lovebaltor said:
yes!!!I saw the movie and they didnt put the fight beween Ares and Percy!!!!Annabeth is like 23 years old,brunnet and so ugly!!Not to mention Luke!I mean they butchered the poor guys character!!!:(
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
I KNEW IT!! XC
aquamoon posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
hi i have just seen the movie and i really enjoyed it especially the relationship between annabeth and perct:) but does that relationship exist in the books?? coz i want 2 read them now:)
jess_welsh posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
ya the fight bettween ares & percy isn't there and tht is the most inmortent part but then insted there was a fight bettween luke and percy and percy never got stung द्वारा the बिच्छू like in the book when luke put it in his hand
suzieq7 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
K5-HOWL said:
I have'nt seen the movie yet
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
u should
suzieq7 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
dangerofthought said:
Totally. Percy Jackson 1 was possibly the worst adaptation of a book ever. The entire Nashville scene wasn't in the book, they went to St. Louis. The movie made most of the quest about finding the pearls, but the pearls were a gift from Poseidon! There was no mention of Ares, they made Luke the bad guy already.

I do like what they did with the Grover character, even if its not true to the book. The movie needed some comic relief and Grover is a good place to get it. I hate how they made Persephone this "sex" goddess. If Persephone hadn't been there, the entire quest would've ended with the हीरोस being stuck in the अंडरवर्ल्ड forever.

I really hope this movie didn't have the approval of Riordan, because if he approved this script, he basically backstabed all of the पुस्तकें fans.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
OMG
aquamoon posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
They probably had to bribe him -.-
catsrule465 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
what also makes no since is in greek mythology persophone wasn't there in the summer which means she shouldn't have been there she sould have been up with her mother demeter!!
suzieq7 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
the only book और f**ked up was एरागोन
percabeth5 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
avatarluver990 said:
I watched it today! I liked it! Grover was FUNNY!!! Alothough in the book he was a bit goofy and cuddly and stuff. But OMG!!! I AM SOOOOOOOOO MAD!!! THEY TOOK OUT THE MOST IMPORTANT REASON WHY THE BOLT WAS STOLEN!!!!!! THEY DIDN'T MENTION KRONOS!!! NOT EVE ONCE!!! THEY MADE LUKE THE VILLAN OF EVERYTHING!!!! AND THEY DIDNT EVEN CONSULTED THE ORACLE, AND THEY DIDN'T HAVE THE SCENE WHEN PERCY FIGHTS CLARISSE AND THE TRIDENT HOVERS ABOVE HIS HEAD!!!! THEY TOOK OUT CLARISSE!!! And Percy only gets a sheild in the 2nd book! AND ARES WAS THE ONE THAT PUT THE BOLT IN PERCY'S BACKPACK!!!!!!!! OMG, I thought this movie was gonna be a hit, but it's just gonna be another failed movie! And I dnt think they're even gonna make Sea Of Monsters cuz in the end I think Luke dies.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
X_X how can they live with themselves after this epic fall!!
aquamoon posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
There's lighning outside... Zeus isnt pleased either.
catsrule465 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
seriously! kronos is like as important as percy!
silverwarrior posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
catsrule465 said:
THEY KILLED THE BOOK! what the heck! i went and saw it today w/ my bf and we both agreed that they totally butchered the movie! nothing was the same! How could Rick let us down like this?!?!
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
Agreed
lovebaltor posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
yep
suzieq7 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
Stand up and say something Rick! Geez dude!
Corgilover183 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
once लेखक sells rights its out of his hands
percabeth5 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
emostan said:
yeah its deffenietly messed up.
but its good in a way that different from the book
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
jacksonrain said:
फिल्में never live up to the book.

But I watched it this weekend, and I thought it was a fairly good adaption of a book.
Logan Lerman portrayed Percy Jackson well.
And I like the change in Grover's character.
Annabeth was the most problem I had, I can look past she's not blonde and that she's 23, because she looks younger but she is so monotone, anything she कहा seemed weird, she wasn't convincing.

All in all, I liked it
And thought it was good
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
Ashyroxsox said:
The movie was good but it was so different from the book!!! I thought it was good but just different than the book. I wish they had the Aries fight and the मकड़ी part with Annabeth and Percy
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
18wanda said:
Absolutely not. Well, I haven't read the book yet, but my sister who did says it is pretty much like the book. They left out a few things probably so the movie wouldn't be eternal.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
LoudMouth said:
I've read the पुस्तकें and the movie is different. I got so mad that medusa wasn't even black. That's what the book said. This movie stuff and पुस्तकें never match. Their total opposites.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
read the ultimate guide miss loud mouth आप probly are loud
dawn00 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
i know medusa wasn't supposed to be black it was green
dawn00 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
UrufukoJaan said:
I haven't read the book... but the movie looks terrible.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
आप have to read them they are AWESOME!! XD
aquamoon posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
silverwarrior said:
ok, i could seriously care less if the characters dont exactly match thier विवरण (though its nice when they do!), but when they leave out major characters and event, thats when i get mad! especially cuz i still loved the movie, but now its gonna be hard for them to do the rest of the series!
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
dawn00 said:
no but they did leave out clarisse and ares .
and at the end grover was supposed to go खोजिए
for pan . they also lefet that out .
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
sorry i missed typed
dawn00 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
GroversCoNveRse said:
LOOK GUYS THE MOVIE WAS VERY DIFFERENT BUT AWESOME JUST FOR A SEC FORGET THE BOOK AND THE MOVIE WAS TERRIFIC A GREAT ACTION STORY YEAH IT WAS DIFFERENT BUT GOOD SERIOUSLY GIVE IT A CHANCE I BET RICK LOVES AND SUPPORTS IT EVEN IF IT IS OFF HE MADE IT TO ENTERTAIN HIS SON AND I AM BETTING IT DID
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
Corgilover183 said:
heck yeah. They missed alot of things. very important things. I waas depressed after i saw it. i was like," daddy! they guy who directed the movie should stick to harry potter movies!" since he was the one who created the harry pottter movies.But i like the humor. Cool beans.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
PERCYJACKS0N said:
they so have messed it up >:( i neva sawq the पुस्तकें in the same way after i watched the movie :'( so sad
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
Ares is very important in the first book 2 and they missed him out!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PERCYJACKS0N posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
next question »