1) Sure, Harry got तितलियों in his stomach when her saw Cho[ Before Sirius' death] but after every तारीख, दिनांक they had together Harry always ended up और miserable than he already was. A good example would be Valentines दिन in Hogsmeade.
2)Speaking of Valentines day,
Cho: "Oh, you'll talk to Hermione Granger! But आप won't talk to me! P-perhaps it would be best if we just...just p-paid and आप went and met up with Hermione G-Granger, like आप obviously want to!"
Cho always seemed to be jealous of Harry and Hermione's relationship. In fact, there were multiple arguments about Hermione...
Cho: "That was a really horrible trick of Hermione Granger's. She should've told us she'd jinxed that सूची - "
Harry: "I think it was a brilliant idea."
Cho: "Oh yes, I forgot - of course, if it was darling Hermione's idea -"
Harry: "Don't start crying again."
3)Even after Marietta told Umbridge about the DA, Cho still stood behind her and कहा that she was a good friend. Harry completely disagreed with her and I think that this is when the relationship really began to break apart. Not only that, I don't think that Harry would get along with Cho's लोकप्रिय girl फ्रेंड्स who seem to be nothing like any of Harry's closest friends.
4)Cho got over Harry very quickly. Not long after the battle in the Ministry, Cho was already dating Ginny's ex-boyfriend Michael Corner who decided to comfort Cho after the last quidditch match of the year.
5)Not only did Cho get over Harry quickly, Harry got over Cho.
Ron: "You’re well out of it, mate. I mean, she’s quite good-looking and all that, but आप want someone a bit और cheerful."
Harry: "She’s probably cheerful enough with someone else."
Seperately, Cho and Harry are great but I don't like them together. This doesn't mean that I'm a Harry/Ginny shipper I just think that some couples are magic (haha, no pun intended) and some just are not meant to be.
I recently found a strange contradiction in the concept of wizarding money.I'd like to know if my idea is true या if there is a counter-argument against it.
In pg.65 of HP and the Chamber of Secrets,we learn that Muggle money can be exchanged into wizarding money.
We also know that potentially valuable(in a Muggle point of view) objects such as chairs can be Conjured द्वारा magic(eg:Dumbledore does this in the courtroom in HP and The Order of the Phoenix).
So any wizard who knows basic Transfiguration can Conjure objects such as chairs,sell them to Muggles to obtain Muggle money and then exchange this money into Galleons,thus obtaining an infinite amount of wealth.
Doesn't this contradict the whole point of wizarding money?
Thanks in advance for any help.
In pg.65 of HP and the Chamber of Secrets,we learn that Muggle money can be exchanged into wizarding money.
We also know that potentially valuable(in a Muggle point of view) objects such as chairs can be Conjured द्वारा magic(eg:Dumbledore does this in the courtroom in HP and The Order of the Phoenix).
So any wizard who knows basic Transfiguration can Conjure objects such as chairs,sell them to Muggles to obtain Muggle money and then exchange this money into Galleons,thus obtaining an infinite amount of wealth.
Doesn't this contradict the whole point of wizarding money?
Thanks in advance for any help.
