इस प्रश्न का उत्तर दो

हैरी पॉटर सवाल

Don't आप think the sorting hat made a mistake in putting P. Pettigrew in Gryffindor??

and don't tell me he redeemed himself later when he let harry escape. He only did that because he was in debt to him.
*
i'm not talking about slytherin या hufflepuff या ravenclaw या gryffindor! i was just asking an opinion of why he ended up in gryffindor.I never कहा gryffindor equals good. I actually thought many slytherins for example , have many noble traits:draco, snape,tonks, etc etc. And slytherins stop victimeze yourself about being "hated". Many of आप like this house only because it's so cool to be the "bad guys". Like i कहा in other posts, i don't like that much being sorted in gryfindor, i like slytherin and ravenclaw better, so this wasn't intended to "attack" other houses.
RealAmberEyes posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
(sorry टॉंक्स was in hufflepuff :P)
RealAmberEyes posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
Yes.
cro0010 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
 RealAmberEyes posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
next question »

हैरी पॉटर  सबसे अच्छा जवाब

sesshykiralover said:
Frankly, I don't believe so. Every has it in their head that being a Gryffindor means आप have to be 'good'. Honestly, that isn't true. And as Harry said, the Sorting Hat does take in your wants...like how Harry really wanted to be sorted in Gryffindor.

Anyway, why would P.P have to be sorted in either Slytherin या Hufflepuff? Why Hufflepuff, anyways? I mean...that'd be the last place I would expect him to be sorted. As for Slytherin, that's crazy! Because P.P was a spineless, conniving bastard, he should be sorted into Slytherin? Heh, goes to दिखाना how much some HP प्रशंसकों know about Slytherin. It isn't automatically the house for the 'bad guys'. Honestly, just because a few people who came from Slytherin were evil, doesn't mean all Slytherins are bad!

Anyway, P.P deserved to be in Gryffindor, very much. If anywhere, that's the only place I can see him. He doesn't belong anywhere else....definetely not in Ravenclaw....

Well, maybe. I mean, he had to be doing something right to keep under radar for so long. Maybe he does have a bit of brains...but, that isn't all there is to Ravenclaw.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
best answer *click*
ClaireVoyant posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
did i EVER say anything about him to be sorter here या there?? i was just wondering, that's why i'm asking u guys ,geez, relax
RealAmberEyes posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
next question »

जवाब

BlackHound said:
No, I don't. The Sorting Hat placed Pettigrew in Gryffindor for a reason: to give him the opportunity to live up to his potential. It is not the Sorting Hat's fault that he chose to be a ratshit bastard.

Pettigrew did not let Harry escape; he hesitated when Harry reminded him about the Wizard's Debt, nothing और and nothing less. It wasn't compassion, and if the silver hand his freak master gave him hadn't strangled him first, he would have killed Harry.

There's no way in Hell that slimy, sorry excuse for a human being could have redeemed himself after what he did.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
that makes very much sense,best answer
RealAmberEyes posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
I'd appreciate it if आप didn't use bad language. It goes to दिखाना how much people lack courtesy these days. And sorry, but I think he should go to Hufflepuff.
Helena-B-Carter posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
a cookie
snowwhite2 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
ComoLoca said:
I'm going to go against लोकप्रिय opinion here and say yes it probably made a mistake. He belonged in Slytherin. Not because he was evil but because he had और traits valued द्वारा Slytherins than any of the other houses.

1) He was very cunning - He was a successful spy for the Death Eaters, fooling The Order his best फ्रेंड्स and Dumbledore. He successfully framed Sirius in the process again fooling The Order, the ministry and Dumbledore for 12 years, framed Crookshanks

2) Resourceful - According to everyone who knew him he wasn't a very powerful, charismatic या intelligent wizard, yet he managed to become part of a लोकप्रिय group of boys, be inducted into The Order, avoided being discovered as a traitor, avoided Azkaban after the 1st fall of Voldemort, survived 2 attempts द्वारा Sirius to kill him, avoided capture द्वारा the trio and the 2 marauders, tracked down Voldemort, resurrected Voldemort, etc

3) Determined - He did what he had to accomplish his goals. He spent years learning to become an animagus. He cut his finger off to successfully fake his own death, he lived for 12 years as a pet चूहा in a household with 6 boys and a little girl to escape Azkaban. He single-handedly searched for, found Voldemort and brought him back to a somewhat corporeal form and returned him to Britain, cut his own arm off to bring Voldemort back, etc.

4) Ambitious - He didn't want to just be left alone and plod along. He always aligned himself with who he thought were the most powerful people या group. In High School it was the Marauders. After School it was the Death Eaters. Even while in hiding, he chose the Weasleys, a family very visibly on the "winning side", to hide in.

5) Certain disregard for rules - That goes without saying. He cast Unforgivables, killed people, broke school rules along with the Marauders, etc, etc

6) Strong sense of self preservation - Again this goes without saying. I think in fact this was Pettigrew's main reason behind all his actions. Everything he did was to save his own skin, regardless of how it would affect anyone else.


select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
I agree with you! *votes for best answer*
Manonx posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
:-) Thank आप
ComoLoca posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
rosemina said:
Well,it's obvious that Pettigrew doesn't suit in any of the hogwarts houses.Gryffindor,the house of brave,isn't really for this coward rat.Pettigrew is definitely not a smart या wise person at all,so Ravenclaw is out of the सवाल too.I don't understand why Hufflepuff is so underestimated.I mean, it's the house of the loyal,honest,just and true friends, which to me are some of the most special personality traits.So,Pettigrew,who betrayed his best friends,in Hufflepuff???Not really. Now, as for Slytherin,like many कहा before me,it's not the house of evil.It's the house of the proud,ambitious,cunning and those,who have a chance to succeed या excel in something,bad या good.So, I don't think Pettigrew could be a Slytherin. But Dumbledore कहा that the hat always takes in mind our choices, and I think Peter always felt weak.He was always after strong या powerful people,like James,Sirius,then Voldemort.It makes sense to me,that his most inner desire was to be a strong,brave person, so he wouldn't have to hide in other people's shadows.He thought Gryffindor was the best house,and this is why the Sorting Hat placed him there.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
best सेकंड answer
RealAmberEyes posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
Maybe he should be a Squib
koolamelia posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
Yes,that would suit him
rosemina posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
PotterLambert93 said:
I think it was a terrible mistake. The whole point of being in Gryffindor is to be ब्रेव and noble, and unfortunately Peter is neither of those things. If he truely was, he shouldn't have betrayed Lilly and James in the first place. Just like what Sirius कहा in POA, he would rather have died than betray his own best friends. Peter should have been in either Hufflepuff या Slytherin.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
आप know absolutely nothing about Hufflepuff if आप can even suggest that.
BlackHound posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
gryffindor doesn't equal pure goodness! for God's sake!
ClaireVoyant posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
Thank आप so very much. I'm sure your family and फ्रेंड्स worship आप too. Who wouldn't? आप are so humorous and आप appear to have a lovely, very advanced vocabulary. Nice going!
Helena-B-Carter posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
ClaireVoyant said:
it's to दिखाना that just because someone sorted into gryffindor doesn't meant that they are all good. bleagh! I hate that people always make gryffindor equal goodness just because they are 'brave' and 'nobel', and slytherin equal evil just because. does slughorn या snape evil? I don't think so.

in my opinion, people and their stereotype, especially one that always call hufflepuff as weak and dull are arrogant, hypocrite bastard.
and gryffindor are my least प्रिय house just saying.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
i repeat, i'm not talking about good and evil here, i'm talking about Pettigrew character in HARRY POTTER BOOKS, don't take it personale!
RealAmberEyes posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
personal"
RealAmberEyes posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
lol, I am not angry at you, just some people always कहा that if they are bad goes to slytherin and useless goes to hufflepuff. i hate that misconception. and to me, some gryffindor can be a bully so it's not exactly wrong house for wormtail.
ClaireVoyant posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
snigdhanuzhat said:
yes
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
Great argument. -_-
sesshykiralover posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
I actually lol'd at that टिप्पणी दे
Mrs-X posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Mrs-X said:
Maybe... It's kind of hard to be sure about it... I mean he definitely wasn't smart enough for Ravenclaw. So then Hufflepuff? He's not loyal so he wouldn't fit there either. So that leaves us with Gryffindor and Slytherin... If आप look at the characteritics we find in both houses and compare them to Peter's, I honestly can't see him in Slytherin. Actually, I can't really see him in any of the house so I'm guessing he must have wanted to be in Gryffindor when the sorting hat was making its choice so that's why he ended up there. Don't make the mistake of thinking Slytherin automatically means "evil/bad guy" because it doesn't.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
*characteristics *houses
Mrs-X posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
that's what i first thought: he actually doesn't belong anywhere...
RealAmberEyes posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
rere14 said:
I don't think his character fit with any of the houses, he wasn't ब्रेव enough to be a Gryffindor, he doesn't has the dignity and the sense of proud with their heritage like Slytherin, he wasn't smart enough to be a Ravenclaw , and he doesn't loyal enough to be a Hufflepuff, but I don't believe the sorting hat make a mistake, it put him in Gryffindor for a reason, It just wasn't clear what the reason, perhaps he did have a trait of Gryffindor but in my opinion that चूहा shouldn't be in the Hogwarts at all!
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
well said.
RealAmberEyes posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
QWElaine said:
Yeah,the hat definitely made a mistake,because Pettigrew is such a coward!!!
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
KitKatLex said:
I think he was put there just to be फ्रेंड्स with James and the others. And when he betrayed them, it is just to add on to the story.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
lostandhp4ever said:
Yes, he did. Not because of good या evil. Voldemort या Bellatrix could be in Gryffindor too, because they were brave. P.Pettigrew was a coward...
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
koolamelia said:
No. Pettigrew was placed in Gryffindor and a Gryffindor he is. To be honest, he doesn't fit all the qualities of a Gryffindor, I mean, look at Neville. At first he was a right wimp and I don't know about you, but I wondered why the hell he was put in Gryffindor. If आप study the Gryffindor house a bit more, you'll understand that आप don't have to kill a Horcrux to become one या protect your फ्रेंड्स या sacrifice आप life.

Pettigrew does NOT fit with a Hufflepuff. Just because they maybe a little bit quiet and shy, doesn't mean a two-faced coward belongs there. The same goes for Slytherin, that house is completely misunderstood. Just because the majority of Death Eaters were places there doesn't mean myself (I'm a Slytherin) is going to kill आप on the spot.

आप don't know what could of been going threw Pettigrew's mind when he went searching for Voldemort. For all we know, he could of gone mental inside, fear could had overtaken him like ठगना, हेराफेरी and did things he now regrets. I'm not covering for Pettigrew या making an excuse, I'm just suggesting that we don't everything we'd like to know about him and therefor don't have much rights the judge him.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
Yeah, yeah we do have the right to judge him. He betrayed Lily and James, murdered 12 innocent Muggles, then framed Sirius for the whole thing. I don't need to know anything और about him.
Incantus posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
For your kind attention, Pettigrew himself went and volunteered information of Lily and James. Voldemort didn't go after him in the first place.
Reyna4ever25 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
*
Remember we both have light and dark inside of us. What matters is the part we choose to act on, that's who we really are. Peter could have been a lot different when he was younger. He was accepted द्वारा the coolest kids in the school so आप have no idea what he could have been like back then.
koolamelia posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Incantus said:
No, I don't think the Sorting Hat made a mistake. Peter Pettigrew is the only one responsible for his actions. He's the one who chose to do what he did. He could have been brave, like so many other people were, and defied Voldemort, but he chose to take the path of Darkness.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
Castalinia said:
RON WAS WRONG! HE कहा THERE WASN'T A WITCH या WIZARD WHO WENT BAD THAT WASN'T IN SLYTHERYN! PETER PETTIGREW! HE WENT BAD BUT HE WAS IN GRYFFINDOR!
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
Ron कहा that BEFORE anyone knew what Pettigrew had done
koolamelia posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
loulouppg said:
No, I think it was due to his fickle nature.

Say what आप like about slytherin (although branding an 11 साल old evil due to a trait he/she may grow out of and due to a musty old hat of dubious morality/legality (sure there has got to be a law about पढ़ना minds without consent, seeing as the kids had no clue that it was going to read there minds) is sure to create some issues with the kids) but they where consitant with there haterd and where not easily swayed. They always hated Harry and stuck to what they believed.

Gryffindor (as well as Ravenclaw (peter wasnt a book worm enough for that house i think) and Hufflepuff (the house of the loyal ... Enough said)) on the other hand where easily swayed. When Harry did something they liked they were all buddy buddy but as soon as something happened they didnt like (parseltoungue, daily profit articles) mostly they where quick blame him.
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
Crazy8s17 said:
The hat never makes mistakes my friend.....
select as best answer
posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना 
*
Yes it does, sometimes I think Snape was put in the wrong house and Dumbledore and I quote, "Sometimes, Severus, I think we sort too soon."
cro0010 posted एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
next question »