Okay, it's something that bothers me a lot, and I guess it bothers others as well, but I've noticed that a lot of fangirls (of a lot of things, not just Twilight), base their opinions off the looks and the materialistic things in books, movies, singers, मशहूर हस्तियों et cetera.
I personally think it's stupid. Just because someone's good looking doesn't mean they're good. In fact, in some cases it's awful.
What really made me notice was these reasons a girl gave to me as to why Twilight is better than HP:
1.kristen stewart is hot;)
2.robert pattinson, nomnomnom♥
3.taylor lautner is lursh;D
4. they're वैंपायर c'mon:O
5.they sparkle!!
6.there's a wedding:')
7.they have a baby(aa)
8.theres were भेड़िया aswel D:
9.SHINY VOLVOOOS xxxxxxx
10.ashley green is booom;P
yuuuuuup♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
to which, after several headdesks on my part, I replied:
1. Just because an actress portraying a character is good looking it does not contribute to the storyline in any way. Instead say why आप think Bella is a well developed character, if आप do believe this to be so.
2. Again, the actor's attractiveness does not contribute to the plot.
3. See above.
4. And? Yes, they're vampires, and how on earth does this provide a good story with a gripping plot? I wouldn't even call them vampires, myself. वैंपायर aren't supposed to be pretty and sweet and loving and sparkly. They're supposed to be dark and dangerous, an edge that could be lethal to anyone close by.
5. Again, this contributes to the story... how? Besides, I'd always see the sparkling as a con, not a pro.
6. ... are आप sirius-lee suggesting this as a reasons as to why Twilight is better than Harry Potter? There's a wedding in Harry Potter, too, and even though a wedding is always nice it does not contribute to a good, strong plot.
7. Again, they have शिशु in Harry Potter. If आप really think you're gonna win me over with an argument like "they have a baby (aa)" then you're sirius-lee mistaken.
8. URGH. Yes, there were a couple of वेयरवोल्फ in Harry Potter, yet please tell me, though they are IN the story, how on earth do they make Twilight any better than Harry Potter?
9. Oh my goodness, if आप asked me for ten reasons as to why HP is better than Twilight, I don't think FLYING FORD ANGLIA! Would be one of them. I can't believe आप thought something as materialistic as a shiny car can make me think Twilight is better than HP.
10. See 1, 2 & 3.
Though I know a lot of Twilight प्रशंसकों aren't like this, the majority are. This isn't something I made up, it was an actual girl. She's a nice girl, but extremely shallow.
Something like looks does not contribute to a good story. If someone asked me why I like Harry Potter, the good looks of the actors would not be in my सूची of reasons.
It's okay to fangirl, but to judge an entire series of the character's looks is appalling. It's one of the reasons I went off Twilight. Because I realised that if the characters were ugly या flawed, a bunch of people wouldn't like it.
Of course, some would, because of the "love", but that's another thing that bothers me, but I'm going off topic.
Of course, there are shallow HP प्रशंसकों as well, but the majority I've seen, even though they like the looks of the characters as well, don't base their opinion ENTIRELY off looks.
As I said, it's okay to fangirl, just don't base your opinion on a series off looks.
I personally think it's stupid. Just because someone's good looking doesn't mean they're good. In fact, in some cases it's awful.
What really made me notice was these reasons a girl gave to me as to why Twilight is better than HP:
1.kristen stewart is hot;)
2.robert pattinson, nomnomnom♥
3.taylor lautner is lursh;D
4. they're वैंपायर c'mon:O
5.they sparkle!!
6.there's a wedding:')
7.they have a baby(aa)
8.theres were भेड़िया aswel D:
9.SHINY VOLVOOOS xxxxxxx
10.ashley green is booom;P
yuuuuuup♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
to which, after several headdesks on my part, I replied:
1. Just because an actress portraying a character is good looking it does not contribute to the storyline in any way. Instead say why आप think Bella is a well developed character, if आप do believe this to be so.
2. Again, the actor's attractiveness does not contribute to the plot.
3. See above.
4. And? Yes, they're vampires, and how on earth does this provide a good story with a gripping plot? I wouldn't even call them vampires, myself. वैंपायर aren't supposed to be pretty and sweet and loving and sparkly. They're supposed to be dark and dangerous, an edge that could be lethal to anyone close by.
5. Again, this contributes to the story... how? Besides, I'd always see the sparkling as a con, not a pro.
6. ... are आप sirius-lee suggesting this as a reasons as to why Twilight is better than Harry Potter? There's a wedding in Harry Potter, too, and even though a wedding is always nice it does not contribute to a good, strong plot.
7. Again, they have शिशु in Harry Potter. If आप really think you're gonna win me over with an argument like "they have a baby (aa)" then you're sirius-lee mistaken.
8. URGH. Yes, there were a couple of वेयरवोल्फ in Harry Potter, yet please tell me, though they are IN the story, how on earth do they make Twilight any better than Harry Potter?
9. Oh my goodness, if आप asked me for ten reasons as to why HP is better than Twilight, I don't think FLYING FORD ANGLIA! Would be one of them. I can't believe आप thought something as materialistic as a shiny car can make me think Twilight is better than HP.
10. See 1, 2 & 3.
Though I know a lot of Twilight प्रशंसकों aren't like this, the majority are. This isn't something I made up, it was an actual girl. She's a nice girl, but extremely shallow.
Something like looks does not contribute to a good story. If someone asked me why I like Harry Potter, the good looks of the actors would not be in my सूची of reasons.
It's okay to fangirl, but to judge an entire series of the character's looks is appalling. It's one of the reasons I went off Twilight. Because I realised that if the characters were ugly या flawed, a bunch of people wouldn't like it.
Of course, some would, because of the "love", but that's another thing that bothers me, but I'm going off topic.
Of course, there are shallow HP प्रशंसकों as well, but the majority I've seen, even though they like the looks of the characters as well, don't base their opinion ENTIRELY off looks.
As I said, it's okay to fangirl, just don't base your opinion on a series off looks.
This लेख isn't mine, this is just an लेख I found on cracked.com (one of the best sites ever!). I agree with most of it, and on that note remember this is opion based, not fact. This is...*drumroll* if आप don't hate Twilight already, why आप SHOULD hate Twilight!
Click here to check out the article:
link
Enjoy, and no getting pissy (that's right I'm talking to आप Twilight प्रशंसक girls) if you're going to post, DON'T POST unless आप write something I can understand. For example, THIS is something I can't understand:
omg liek edward iz liek sooo hawt an like sexxii an liek OMG umminess an u hateur iz liek tttly stoopid an homo an--
It's hurts too much to even finish the example! Anyway, again no haters and enjoy!
Click here to check out the article:
link
Enjoy, and no getting pissy (that's right I'm talking to आप Twilight प्रशंसक girls) if you're going to post, DON'T POST unless आप write something I can understand. For example, THIS is something I can't understand:
omg liek edward iz liek sooo hawt an like sexxii an liek OMG umminess an u hateur iz liek tttly stoopid an homo an--
It's hurts too much to even finish the example! Anyway, again no haters and enjoy!