How come the fact that the वैंपायर sparkle is annoying everyone?

it doesnt bother me in the least.I happen to प्यार Twilight and i am a Twi-Hard and proud of it.I wear it like a badge of honor.I happen to प्यार sparkly vampires,especially if their name is Cullen,especially Edward.Yes,I am also a Team Edward प्रशंसक and am even और proud to be a member of that club too.If आप think I am a teenage girl आप are wrong,because Twilight isn't just for teenage girls.That isn't Edward's sparkly skin आप see in the sunlight,that is his soul that आप see and if आप ask me that just makes him all the और beautiful.His inner beauty coupled with his outer beauty truly makes him sparkle.

It doesn't really matter whether he sparkles या not.Its what's inside that really counts.99 % of all Team Edward girls were drawn to Edward because of his charm,sensitivity,and chivalry.He was very पुराने ज़माने का, पुराने जमाने and gentle-man-like.Something that आप don't really see much today.

Well I on one hand don't find anything really bad about it since Edward to me is just a negative character who I never really liked.
On to the सवाल i think others hated it because वैंपायर used to be known as fierce blood sucking murders who were sensual and just bad नितंब, गधा i.e वैंपायर like in Angel, या Buffy the vampire Slayer, aand the anne चावल vamps and a lot of प्रशंसकों of the classic vampire genre where insulted that she kinda degraded the awesomness of the vampire and instead of making them combust into flames in the sun she made them glitter which according to some opinions i have seen makes people see the वैंपायर as pansies and just lame due to the fact the sparkle.
I think a lot of classic vampire प्रशंसकों were just insulted at what meyer turned the vampire genre into.

I just can't take the sparkles seriously. It reminds me of the इंद्रधनुष Magic पुस्तकें I used to read when I was a kid.

I might've actually liked twilight somewhat if the वैंपायर didn't sparkle like giant fairy boys.

Well, think about it. Before Twilight, वैंपायर are supposed to be like half bat and half person, right? So, whenever people think about them going out into the sunlight, they would think they'd burn. Sparkling bodies is usually how to describe a fairy. Of course that's going to annoy people. I mean, a sparkling vampire? Wow, that would sound unrealistic with the fact that वैंपायर are just supposed to burn in the sun instead of sparkling. Like, didn't आप think the same thing would happen before Twilight came out? I don't know if this जवाब your सवाल but hopefully it will.

Meyers basically ruined वैंपायर in a sense. वैंपायर are supposed to be turned to ash when they step out in the sunlight. परियों normally are the ones who sparkle and then theres the fact that Meyers makes her वैंपायर hard to kill. Then there is how she makes them from blood-sucking murderers to...basically what Edward Cullen is. A human loving,stalkerish,sparkly vampire who should have been a fairy instead.

It's because it makes it even और different to the classical vampire image; it literally means वैंपायर don't have a physical weakness. After all, if they're seen sparkling, they can just kill the humans who saw and हटाइए to a different place या country. Although it's good to be original, a lot of people (including myself) feel that twilight वैंपायर aren't vampires. They don't burn in the sun, they don't not like holy water या Bibles, they don't seem to be allergic to silver (at least it isn't mentioned in the series, I think; I admit I didn't exactly reread Twilight), and they can't be killed with a stake through the heart. Their only weakness is sparkling, which isn't vampire-like, making them hardly वैंपायर at all, and isn't really a weakness at all.

As well as making वैंपायर annoying Gary-Stuish, it's seen as very shallow: as in, oh, of course even vamps supposed weakness makes them handsome and beautiful. Please don't attack me for saying this, आप asked why people hate sparkling, and I answered. It's not a weakness, shallow, and kind of lame.

Oh, and it's seen as gay for boys to sparkle. I don't like that argument, but lots of people think that.

There is sense in why वैंपायर burn in sun:
It's becoz they are unholy creature and they cheat natural process of human life so nature found a way to go against them
The logic Meyer came with her sparkling वैंपायर was very stupid:
She कहा that they have diamond like reflective cells in their body that reflect (sparkle) when they come under direct sunlight but a reflective surface will reflect in whatever light it comes under and it need not be sunlight only so there is actually no logic in what Meyer said.
वैंपायर are negative characters and though now they seem to have become हीरोस of many major सूपरनॅचुरल fiction peple still prefer them in anti-hero role than being all sugary sweet and human

it doesn't bother me in the least,infact it makes them even और extraordinary