डिज़्नी प्रिन्सेस Unpopular डिज़्नी opinions (confessions)

viktoriya773 posted on Feb 10, 2014 at 11:53PM
Post your unpopular Disney opinion here. Express your opinion about not only DP but Disney in general. Please be respectful about each other's opinions and don't bash someone because of it. Say "I disagree/agree with you because..." I'm sure everyone is mature enough to handle it.
save

डिज़्नी प्रिन्सेस 813 उत्तरों

Click here to write a response...

Showing Replies 601-650 of 813

एक साल  से अधिक पुराना anukriti2409 said…
Some unpopular opinions on Moana

1. The plotline is quite weak and a mishmash of TLM's opposite view and Mulan. It became so predictable. The execution of it is though pretty good.
2. I still didnt understand why ocean chose Moana?
3. I dont Maui as great a character as everyone seems to be making him
4. Music of Moana is more beautiful than the lyrics of its songs. Lyrics are quite unoriginal imo
5. I think i'll lose my love for Moana much more quickly.

MaidofOrleans commented…
Agree with pretty much all of these, although I प्यार most of the lyrics. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
disnerdtobe commented…
Yeah the plotline is like a combo of TLM and Mulan. And I also प्यार the संगीत but the lyrics are pretty generic. I don't really know why the ocean chose Moana. My only theory is that the ocean saw how Moana was excited द्वारा grandma's stories while all the other kids freaked out and that Moana protected the कछुआ, कछुए at the very beginning दिखा रहा है her nurturing side I guess. Maybe there wasn't a particular reason. It's probably that the ocean saw something in her and thought her संपूर्ण, कुल मिलाकर personality was suited for that mission idk. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Sparklefairy375 commented…
I agree with all of these. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना MalloMar said…
I think Moana is one of the best/most enjoyable Cgi Disney movies, second only to Wreck it Ralph. The others (Tangled, Brave, BH6, Zootopia, Frozen, and Bolt) are objectively very good movies, but I personally just like them.
wavesurf commented…
I kind of feel that with Moana, "there was an actual story this time," not a weird rewite of an original story with nothing going on at all in the revised version. But I did see a lot of copy-paste from TLM, Mulan, and oddly-- Raiders of the लॉस्ट Ark. lol. Anyhow, I just feel it was a better offering than some of the prior फिल्में of the Revival (TPATF, Brave, Frozen, BH6, etc.) For me, Moana is और like टैंगल्ड and Wreck-It Ralph. I don't necessarily mind any of them, but, as आप said, I have a heard time feeling anything for the modern era except a "like" या a "dislike." I'm now wondering if I'll ever get back to loving an animated film the way I did before. And I don't think this is rooted in nostalgia at all. It's just that my expectations are so..erm...high. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
MalloMar commented…
No, I completely get you. There is a lot of 'Disney checklist' in Moana (main character feels trapped, 'I want' Song, character personalities, etc.) but I also haven't enjoyed any of their other 'modern formulaic' फिल्में as much as this one. Maybe its the music, एनीमेशन and/or setting...something beautiful and magical that I haven't seen since The Princess and the Frog. Then again, I know आप didn't like that one either. Its cool. Thanks for commenting. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
xanara commented…
I liked फ्रोज़न and Moana the most. They are the most classic डिज़्नी to me. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना MalloMar said…
Another Moana one...I laughed at Heihei...a lot. I mean, he is supposed to be a comedic sidekick. It honestly didn't enter my mind at the time that this character would be taken offensively or was making fun of anyone (since Disney has included less intelligent characters in some of their movies) until I came to Fanpop. I do understand people's problem with this character now that I think about it and I do feel sh*tty for finding this character hilarious. I guess I have somewhat of a dumb sense of humor (Then again, I don't usually find these types of characters/humor funny). Anyway, those are my thoughts. I did want to see more of Pua. He's adorable.
scarletunicorn commented…
i see Pua और as a flounder. not really "funny"; but really only there to look cute (sell toys). I'm thinking they had in mind not putting sidekicks in this movie, which is why they feel so...pointless. आप can cut them out and the movie works just fine. Maui works best as a sidekick over either of them anyhow. He's basically the Genie to Moana's Aladdin. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
wavesurf commented…
I did find Heihei the equivalent of Maximus, Olaf, and Sven. Stupid just so the story doesn't become too morose. But he did save the "heart" thingy a couple of times for Moana...so this might be an unpopular opinion. I don't think Heihei is as stupid as he appears. At the end of the movie, there is a distinct change in Heihei's viewpoint about the ocean. And I had to laugh. Even he GREW and changed. Which was surprising for a tiny minor, minor sidekick. आप usually don't see that happening at all. So I cut Heihei some slack. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Sparklefairy375 commented…
^That scene is from teaser trailer and fyi, डिज़्नी usually don't use scenes from teaser trailer in the movie. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना anukriti2409 said…
"You're welcome" is stuck in my head and i keep humming it. I love the upbeat music of it. I like it more than the other songs as of now.
deedragongirl commented…
I completely forgotten how it sound like already!! एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
scarletunicorn commented…
yes, the songs are very catchy एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना scarletunicorn said…
I think Meg and Bagheera are my favorite Disney characters full-stop (if we're gonna rank by male and female). Probably not the most conventional choices but there's something about the two of them that appeals to me massively. (and no, it's not a furry thing). Must be either their personalities and that they're in two of my fave Disney films.

I just wish they had more merch and attention given by Disney themselves. We just had the Jungle Book remake, I know, but rather we'd have some merchandise aimed to the older crowd...? I'd totally love to see something like a bag themed by the green of the jungle book or a purple scarf based on Meg.
I'm the same with other characters and movies, though. Like i'd love a stylized drawing of say, Moana and Maui, or Merida's bear locket.
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना MalloMar said…
I can imagine I'll get some disagreements here, but this is why we have this forum. I loved The Good Dinosaur. I can admit it isn't particularly a fresh idea, it's predictable, it's logic is flawed and it just overall isn't technically great. I saw the everything wrong with TGD before actually seeing the movie. At the time I hadn't planned on seeing it. Anyway, based on that, I thought I'd roll my eyes throughout the movie and that I'd be annoyed by the characters, but I was wrong. I enjoyed all of it. Though some characters did fall into the annoying range, I eventually grew to like all of them.

I think most agree that it's visually beautiful, and I'm not going to argue. The soundtrack was on point and it captured the emotional content very well. I guess I like that this movie doesn't try hard to be modern and cool, and it doesn't make references to pop culture. It just tells a story unlike a lot of newer movies. It has a lot of charm.

So pretty much, I can admit this film isn't perfect, but I enjoy it very much, and consider it one of my favorite Pixar films.
SAID NO ONE EVER
...Except I just did. I hope y'all don't hate me for this. 🙂
scarletunicorn commented…
Hmm it's okay. I was kinda like that with Moana, i saw a buttload of flaws in the film, but i still like it. i think it's my प्रिय of the "road trip" फिल्में Disney's done /at least compared to Frozen, Tangled, PATF and Zootopia, I definitely prefer Moana over any of those) एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Sparklefairy375 commented…
It was okay for me. The एनीमेशन is visually beautiful, but the story is just kinda predictable and generic, if compared with other पिक्सार फिल्में which most of them have fresh ideas of plots in their other movies. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
SarahCorine commented…
I प्यार The Good Dinosaur. It's my प्रिय पिक्सार movie. I प्यार Arlo, not to mention his name. I want to name my son Arlo. It's so original. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना MaidofOrleans said…
I think the Renaissance Era is overrated. There, I said it. I don't have a favorite era and I think they each have their respective strengths and weaknesses. Each era has some amazing films to its name. Each era also has some not so great or even downright terrible movies in it. I don't think the Renaissance is any better or worse than the Classic or Revival Eras, they just each have different strengths.
UnholyNoise commented…
Agreed! Though I do think nothing tops early renaissance songwriting. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
wavesurf commented…
@Sparklefairy: Whatever. आप just state the same stuff over and over. And as for not understanding, आप never made an attempt to understand, either. आप just pass judgement on other people. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
wavesurf commented…
@Unholynoise: So blaming the Renaissance प्रशंसकों for continuing to प्यार their "90s movies" somehow is the solution for the discrepancy in attention आप see for other eras? Well, ain't that rather convenient. That sounds like a really poor way to make फ्रेंड्स with fellow डिज़्नी fans. But go ahead. Aggravating people द्वारा blaming them for liking something that is already लोकप्रिय just adds nothing but discord. And we got plenty of blaming when the फ्रोज़न प्रशंसकों jumped down on everyone who didn't enjoy Frozen, and blamed them for not liking it. Life has been swell since then. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना deedragongirl said…
I don't know whether this is considered unpopular or not, but I might as well say it. I wish Tarzan and Prince Adam don't look similar, especially their hair and bony face!
scarletunicorn commented…
they're both animated द्वारा the same guy, tho. they would share similarities एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Sparklefairy375 commented…
Wow, I even didn't really noticed it until I read your opinion! एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
ace2000 commented…
The only similarity I personally see is the long hair. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना disnerdtobe said…
I actually like the mice in Cinderella and don't find them annoying at all. I think the sidekicks are underrated and I wish Disney would bring back talking animal sidekicks again and give them more attention. I actually like how Cinderella had scenes with the mice and Snow White with the dwarfs and I don't consider them filler at all. Like Tangled's Pascal doesn't talk and we hardly see him and Moana's pig and Merida's horse don't talk either.

Actually I find that fairytale romance actually allows more time for friendships. It’s because fairytale romance is very efficient. Like Snow White. Boom, boom done. Then the rest of the movie we focus on her friendship with the dwarves. The romance is more like a nice touch than the main focus of the movie. It’s called Snow White and the SEVEN DWARFS for a reason, not Snow White and Her Prince. In Tangled, they spend so much time on romance to show their “realistic” relationship that we almost forget about her friend Pascal, and somehow Tangled gets praised for that. I think it's misleading that classic DP movies are all about romance and that the newer movies are not. That's not true at all.
last edited एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
xanara commented…
I प्यार this post and very much agree! I don't like too much filler scenes because I like focus on the princess mostly but I प्यार seeing them with their फ्रेंड्स rather than now where they just interact with an obnoxious and rude guy (cough cough Naveen, Flynn, Kristoff, Nick, Maui, etc.) एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
anukriti2409 commented…
i tend to disagree. The main reason that Classic Era is associated with romance isn't because the time spend around दिखा रहा है actual romance but the storyline based on it. That the DP was primarily focused on finding the प्यार of her life. And revival era's main plots are their other desires - opening a business and be successful (Tiana) and finding romance there within; Wanting to know what the light represents and finding the romance within that journey. The romance happens as byproduct of the plot in the revival era. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Sparklefairy375 commented…
Eh, I don't really agree with this. Classic DPs फिल्में are और dominant in terms of romance than friendship. All Princesses always ended up with princes. At the beginning and ending of Snow White, there are romantic scenes between her and prince. A half of सिंडरेला movie is about love. And Sleeping Beauty's main genre is romance. The New DP फिल्में are prioritised the family, friendship, and having a dream और than romance. Yes, they still put romance, like in PATF and Tangled. But family, friendship, and having a dream are और dominant in those two. ब्रेव is full 100% about family, no romance at all. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
wavesurf commented…
I agree with you. The Revival Era is focused on "a brand" of Feminism. Walt's Classic Era and the Renaissance Era had stories that had friendships ( even with minor animal characters) where there was some development even with them. Everything was gradual and took its time. Now, we just get couples shoved together ( who have zero in common at all), या we get "loner girls" who are angry at the whole world, because of some "perceived injustice" that they can't handle respectfully, and must instead display raw bursts of rage. In the Classic Era and the Renaissance, the princesses were kinder, और elegant, और respectful, less argumentative, and और patient about their problems. Yeah. The focus wasn't on some wacked out "notion" of Feminism that involved "literally dumping on romance" for derision and laughs, either. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना mhs1025 said…
Y'all know how The Original 6 consisted of Snow White, Cinderella, Aurora, Ariel, Belle, and Jasmine, right? Well, I just came up with a new theory. Say Anna and Elsa DON'T get added to the lineup and Moana DOES. We could have a new 6! This new 6 would include Pocahontas, Mulan, Tiana, Rapunzel, Merida, and Moana. I think if they put THOSE 6 on merch, it would sell. Plus, Pocahontas and Mulan would get more recognition. What do y'all think about this?
MaidofOrleans commented…
Cool idea! I like it! एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
wavesurf commented…
Well, Tiana, Rapunzel, and Merida are already plastered to backpacks, cups, clothing, and the like. It would be cool to see Poca and मूलन get और attention. And I don't think it would hurt anything, if that were something that happened. But with डिज़्नी these days? It's hard to tell. :/ एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
coolsinger198 commented…
Oh thats interesting! एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना Sparklefairy375 said…
It bothers me when some fans are often compare Classic and Renaissance Eras movies with Revival Era movies as well. I think it's unfair to compare those three different eras as well, as they are create in different time periods, which means characteristic, personality of each characters, and moral messages of movies from each eras are suited with the perspectives of audiences and public in each time periods. For example: Revival era movies are focused more with family and friendship rather than romance, to more attract current audiences, which definitely have different perspective than the audiences from previous eras.
MaidofOrleans commented…
It doesn't really bother me too much, but they are pretty different. However I think there are some themes that can be found in और than one era. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
ace2000 commented…
Didn't think there was attacking, either... Thought I phrased my टिप्पणी दे politely, too :/. @wavesurf: my टिप्पणी दे was not meant to be threatening. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Sparklefairy375 commented…
I do not saying any eras better than others but I'm getting confuse why she always pretend me to bash Renaissance era? (And so do the other users). What she cares is only she didn't want any users bashing anything that she loves (Renaissance, Ariel, there are many examples of them). Meanwhile she bashing things that she hate so much. लोल it's actually very funny when आप didn't want anyone bashing anything that आप love, but आप bashing anything that others प्यार but आप don't. Sigh, does anyone here are felt difficult to learn to respect with what other peoples love? एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना UnholyNoise said…
I think it's funny when people get all bent out of shape that the Revival era movies have this marketing strategy that's about making their characters and morals "better" than those from past eras. Especially Renaissance stans - like, do you guys seriously not remember how aggressively Jasmine, Ariel, Mulan, and especially Belle were marketed as being not passive/dumb/hung up on getting a man like Walt's girls were? Because I sure do.
last edited एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
wavesurf commented…
@Unholynoise: I wonder if आप ( and others) would still get the kind of "reception" you're getting from other fans, if आप didn't decide to call the Renaissance overrated. आप created a sore point, and then proceeded to hammer down on it. But most of the Revival advertising has been exceedingly और aggressive than had been going down during the Renaissance and Classic eras. I don't recall people comparing lions to princesses and demi-gods, for instance. Nor saying that such and such was "the most feminist movie" out of all of the princess movies. Nope. That wasn't done so "brazenly" like it is now. Welcome to when डिज़्नी DID decide to use that sort of tactic out in the open. डिज़्नी created this sickening backlash among fans. The Revival has the worst advertising combination yet. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
UnholyNoise commented…
^ lmao this group has an archive, it's not that hard to scroll back and see how often I've brought up what I don't like about the renaissance - without even going into whether I think it's overrated - and still caught flak for it. And it's not "from other fans" - it's from you. I really don't have this problem with anyone else. You've always been super aggro about this subject and आप always will be. आप know you'd react the same to any pro-revival renaissance-critical टिप्पणियाँ no matter how they're worded. Anyway, literally every renaissance DP was marketed as being better (i.e. और feminist) than the girls of the पूर्व era, and just as obnoxiously - Ariel's shtick is that she doesn't wait to get what she wants, she goes after it. Mulan's marketing was about how she can literally kick a guy's ass. Belle was the worst in how aggressively they made her "not like the other girls." Even now the discourse on her is like that. The revival didn't invent this gimmick, the renaissance did. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
wavesurf commented…
^Disney CREATED this gimmick. डिज़्नी bought into larger society and the ultra-feminist "mindset" and VOILA!--- आप have yourself a wonderful set of new characters who will all be picked apart down to their nucleotides. Gimme a break. The Renaissance didn't START anything. Outside forces from ultra-feminists DROVE डिज़्नी in the lame direction it is going. The rest is history. So आप can stop blaming the Renaissance for every flaw that डिज़्नी currently has. How about blaming societal ideas of feminism? That's definitely what deserves blame, here, and is what I blame. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना KataraLover said…
It might sound weird, but I don't count designs and (somewhat) movements as part of animation. When I think of animation I think of things like the colors of the background and characters, the shadows, the lighting, and effects. I rant designs of characters and other things like that to be part of more of the drawing style rather than animation. I hate the drawing style of Hercules, but I do think the animation is beautiful. With movements, I consider it part of the animation but also not at the same time. I know many are going to disagree with me on this (or are probably confused by what I'm trying to say) but it's just my opinion.
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना xanara said…
It bothers me when certain users attack other people's opinions just because they do not agree exactly with what is the "norm". What's even funnier is that these same users are very defensive and the second an opinion of theirs (that they believe to be fact) is attacked, they lose all restraint and freak out, typing out long diatribes like I am now just to show how ridiculous this all is. People are allowed to have different opinions you know. Debate is not restricted and should in fact be encouraged and that comes from a difference of opinions and beliefs. I'm noticing a very group mentality here where people gang up on others for advocating an opinion that is not shared by the defensive group.
MaidofOrleans commented…
This unfortunately happens a lot of Fanpop. I do my best not to engage unless I am the one getting attacked. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
wavesurf commented…
You're fairly new here... so I'll just say this. Respectful discussion is good as long as it doesn't involve using labels. Once the labels start, the game is toast, and the respect in the argument slides downhill. डिज़्नी introduced a "very discordant" emphasis in the newer films, an even "promoted" some of the in-fighting and friction among the fanbases, just so people would "buy और stuff." Tickets, paraphernalia, etc. The disagreement in our club wasn't something we did to ourselves. We don't live in a vaccum. डिज़्नी brought it to us, द्वारा trying to cater to their demographic. But they ended up "splitting the demographic" instead. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
coolsinger198 commented…
Please, preach. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना ace2000 said…
Athena from Tomorrowland is the best live-action Disney character.
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना KataraLover said…
I've been meaning to post this unpopular opinion for a while and I'm finally going to say it. Melody does NOT blame others for bad things that happen to her. I haven't just heard that here on Fanpop, but also on other sites and really this isn't AT ALL shown in her movie. Where the hell did she even blame others, other than telling Morgana that she tricked her? When her party becomes a disaster she doesn't blame Sebastian or Chef Louis. She even says these exact quotes to her mother while crying: "What's wrong with me?" and "Mom, I'm the princess of disaster!". So far not seeing her as blaming others for her problems. Well, there is when she discovers the locket has her name on it and Ariel reprimands her for going into the sea..... Where she again DOESN'T blame anyone but asks her mother why the locket has her name on it and realizes she's hiding something, but Ariel just changes the subject by saying she disobeyed her.

Not seeing Melody really blaming anyone where, since she's just pointing out the obvious (Ariel is hiding something from her) and asking a reasonable question anyone in her situation would ask but received no answer. Melody has a perfectly good reason for being upset with Ariel because she's hiding something from her, refuses to tell her about it, and changes the subject to Melody disobeying her. I know Ariel has her reasons, but Melody is in the right here and isn't blaming ANYONE! She wanted answers and as far as she knew at that point, no one was going to tell her something important that she had the right to know.

Yes, she does betray her mother and gives the trident to Morgana, but she was mad and not thinking clearly. Ariel had been lying to her for her entire life, especially since it involved something related to her love of the sea and mermaids. Her lack of trust was understandable, plus she's twelve-years-old for crying out loud! When they're mad at their parents, they go against them without thinking clearly and for MUCH LESSER justifiable reasons than Melody. She admits to Flounder that everything is her fault and doesn't blame anyone. She at first got mad at Morgana for tricking her, but soon realized that it was really her own fault. So one time equals her constantly blaming others? BULL CRAP! She even fixes her mistakes by defeating Morgana (with the help of Triton in the end) and apologizes because she realizes her mistake.

I respect other peoples opinion, but I've heard this argument several times (not only on Fanpop but other sites as well) and I'm sorry, but it isn't an opinion when there is NOTHING shown in the movie where she displays this behavior, so it's completely FALSE. A lot of this comes from fans of Ariel that just don't like it when there is a character that doesn't 100% agree with her or go along with her way of thinking. I ADORE Ariel, but don't demonize other characters like Melody or Triton (a confession I've already made) just because they don't agree with her. I don't expect everyone to like Melody just because I do, but don't make up reasons to hate her that are NEVER shown in the movie.
Sparklefairy375 commented…
I completely agree with you. Melody never blaming anyone, instead she seems like blaming herself. Ariel was wrong actually, she hiding the biggest fact of Melody's life and that makes her being upset and it's hard for her to trusting her mother again. She's definitely has और development than Ariel does. I do confuse why some Ariel प्रशंसकों think she's selfish and a brat. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
anukriti2409 commented…
completely agree with this post. Though I dont really enjoy melodoy, but she's definitely not blaming anyone and needs answer for what's her right. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
MaidofOrleans commented…
Totally agree with this! एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
deedragongirl commented…
Although I'm not a प्रशंसक of the sequel, I have to agree. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना Sparklefairy375 said…
Call me bias if you want, but I just don't see how Rapunzel is often called as Mary-Sue by some fans here. Yes, she have many good traits, but it doesn't make her to be too perfect. I think the princesses like Cinderella and Aurora are more like Mary Sue than Rapunzel.
ace2000 commented…
Agree. सिंडरेला is portrayed as miles और beautiful and kind than anyone around her. And Aurora has extreme physical beauty, an extremely beautiful voice, a killer figure, and a kind, calm disposition. Rapunzel is rather insecure and doesn't possess quite as much grace of action as the former two IMO एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
ace2000 commented…
Also Mother Gothel calls her ditzy and vague but anyway. Dunno if the movie really meant that about Rapunzel, since it *is* the villain talking. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
MissCinico commented…
Mary-Sue is an overused term in and of itself. I would say for the modern era Rapunzel fits the specifications of being classified as one. Her flaws aren't really flaws as much as they are ways to make her even और innocent (flawless), so I'd say she's definitely a Mary-Sue in that regard. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना deedragongirl said…
I wish people don't compare Belle to Bella Swan, it's pretty stupid!
Sparklefairy375 commented…
लोल I never seen any peoples who compare them both. They are pretty different. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
anukriti2409 commented…
really? i have never heard of this comparison. And yes, they are world apart. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
disnerdtobe commented…
I know! they're completely different people. the only thing they share is their very similiar naems. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
AudreyFreak commented…
I think the few times I've seen it it's done jokingly but there are definitely similarities: brown eyed brunettes who everyone finds beautiful, everyone wants to be their friend despite being "not like other girls", prefer पुस्तकें to socializing, live with their dad's in small towns, get a fancy गाउन from their new फ्रेंड्स at least once, fall for a controlling guy with a सूपरनॅचुरल nature, was written to be every girl's self-insert. They're pretty alike. It's just "uncool" to compare anyone to Bella. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना KataraLover said…
I think Sadira is more beautiful than Jasmine. If only she was in a product with better animation (Along with a hairbrush).
 I think Sadira is और beautiful than Jasmine. If only she was in a product with better एनीमेशन (Al
deedragongirl commented…
She looks और like a Typical Hispanic princess. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
KataraLover commented…
Did I ask what ethnicity she looked like? NO! I don't think so. So please don't just say बिना सोचे समझे things that have nothing to do with the subject. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
MalloMar commented…
Apologies for the randomness. She reminds me of Gabriella (Not confident thats her name...), the deaf mermaid from the TLM series. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना deedragongirl said…
I'm going to be killed by Kataralover, but I used to hate Beauty and the Beast: The Enchanted Christmas because it's scary and dark for a Christmas film, but after listening to the soundtrack recently, I need to watch it again for Christmas this year!
last edited एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
xanara commented…
I hated the villain. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना anukriti2409 said…
i really want to see a gorgeous, heart-warming good old romantic story in Disney's next movie. Something as simple and beautiful as Me Before You. I'm a little exhausted with the continuous streak of all the action-packed, ambition driven, save the world plots.
Sparklefairy375 commented…
It's such a nice idea but I think डिज़्नी wouldn't make romantic as their priority in their current movies. Except of some remakes of old डिज़्नी movies, though. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
MaidofOrleans commented…
Tbh I actually प्यार the new action packed save the world movies. They're so fun imo! एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
anukriti2409 commented…
^it's not like that I don't enjoy them. ब्रेव is one of my प्रिय फिल्में of all time. I did enjoy टैंगल्ड a lot. And recently Moana too was nice. But I'm saying it would be nice to have some mixes. Its too continuous for me to feel fresh about them. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
wavesurf commented…
The Revival era is becoming monotonous. I agree with a मतदान from Scarletunicorn, and with Anukriti, here. It's the same thing over and over and over again. And now I want something else. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना Sparklefairy375 said…
Call me childish or something like that, but I love the redesign look of Disney Princesses. They looks fresh in the redesign look.
last edited एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
anukriti2409 commented…
i can't say for every princess. But i def like Snow, Cinderella, Tiana and Merida. Rest i prefer original एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
truth76 commented…
I like Aurora's redesign but most of the originals are better than the redesign. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
AudreyFreak commented…
Yeah, some are actually improvements. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना deedragongirl said…
I hated Human Again, because the objects are very selfish and egoistical!
MaidofOrleans commented…
Eh, I disagree. They were turned into objects years prior as a side effect to a spell that wasn't even their fault. I don't think it's selfish for them to want to be human and be able to do human things again. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
anukriti2409 commented…
agree with MaidofOrleans. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
xanara commented…
This is a weird opinion. I would like to see आप turned into an object for 10 years for no fault of your own and then see if आप consider yourself selfish for dreaming of turning human again. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना coolsinger198 said…
These are two opinions. One is unpopular and one isn't, at least I don't think it is.

1. To be completely honest, I like characters that have little or no flaws, which are hard to find. I don't mind Mary Sues. They have traits I admire and when they inspire me to be the best person of myself that I can. Yes they are unrealistic, but since we live in a media-centered world, seeing a character like that can impact the lives of others. And there ARE good people who don't have many flaws.

2. I also find that when people love a character and they obviously have flaws, they fail to recognize it because they love the character that much. I used to do that with my favorite fictional character but I learned that it isn't fair to dismiss it in them, but scold it in other characters.
coolsinger198 commented…
This isn't a subtweet at anyone btw. With all the constant arguments and diatribes going on, I'm not going to intentionally start a fight here. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
truth76 commented…
1. I like to see characters with flaws because they can be relatable but I understand your opinion. 2. I agree. I learned to find flaws in my प्रिय DP and the good things in my least favorite. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
disnerdtobe commented…
I agree with both sides. Personally I sometimes prefer flawed characters like Elsa and sometimes perfect characters can come off as snobby as Wavesurf said. But I definitely see your point and there's absolutely nothing wrong in liking a character आप find inspiring, even if they're Mary Sue-ish. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना deedragongirl said…
Okay, I don't really know whether this is considered a very unpopular opinion or not, but I might as well say it and please forgive me auroraxaurelia for using your image without seeking your permission. But I wish Belle was designed like this. I don't know why, but really!
last edited एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
 Okay, I don't really know whether this is considered a very unpopular opinion या not, but I might as
Sparklefairy375 commented…
Eh, it looks like a crossover between Adam and सिंडरेला from third sequel IMHO. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना Sparklefairy375 said…
I actually enjoy Disney remakes towards the classic animated movies. I think nothing wrong with remaking movies, it's the common thing happen in movies.
MaidofOrleans commented…
I like them too! एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
anukriti2409 commented…
i प्यार डिज़्नी remakes. I even enjoy twists from the original movies. I see it as a different perspective. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
MalloMar commented…
Mixed opinions. I tend to both like and dislike them. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना LittleGoldie said…
I actually like the Beast's human form. I see a lot of people hating on it, but I personally think he looks good.
ace2000 commented…
Same एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
MaidofOrleans commented…
I think he looks good too. I've got a thing for guys with longer hair. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
truth76 commented…
Agreed. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना deedragongirl said…
Disney should make a geeky princess like Princess Mia in the Princess Diaries.
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना KataraLover said…
I think that The Enchantress, Babette/Fifi, the Bimbettes, the woman that says "Good day", and Angelique are more beautiful than Belle! Belle is so common looking and isn't stunning or gorgeous or anything special. She's beautiful but in a more average and ordinary way than the extraordinary beauty that she's made out to be.
 I think that The Enchantress, Babette/Fifi, the Bimbettes, the woman that says "Good day", and Angeli
deedragongirl commented…
Well, Belle looks pretty in her own way. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Sparklefairy375 commented…
I agree with Dee. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
anukriti2409 commented…
i find Belle to be और beautiful in sober and natural way. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
MissCinico commented…
I agree, I think Belle looks plain in comparison to the side characters. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना Sparklefairy375 said…
Though she is considered as "fairest of them all", I don't think Snow White is really pretty.
anukriti2409 commented…
i agree. i have never found snow white to be so exceptionally beautiful. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Aang_Lite_ commented…
Aurora fits the bill of gift of beauty quite nicely though. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना deedragongirl said…
I was very happy that Giselle from Disney's Enchanted is not included in the DP lineup, she's my least favourite princess.
disnerdtobe commented…
I like Giselle but I'm also glad she's not in the lineup. It would be too repetitive bc Giselle was practically designed to be a live-action mesh of all the princesses combined, especially the earlier ones. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना _CatWoman_ said…
This is kind of a confession, but not really unpopular, I just feel like no one's really talked about it. But really think that since Anna and Elsa aren't Disney Princesses (and wont be), that we really shouldn't count them officially in our club (but some people are already doing that). Idk why but it's kinda like if someone included Sofia the First or Megara in the lists/polls for me, where there's a separate club for animated heroines so I just don't think they should be here since they aren't official. Tbh even though I really loved Moana and I'm fairly certain she'll be added, I don't even wanna include her until she's official. But that's just me, I'm not tryna tell you how to live your life or whatever... fight the man, man~
last edited एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
wavesurf commented…
^ Well, I would agree with you...that is, if I had any miniscule power to change anything about this situation. Really, there was a set of मतदानो occurring about three months ago, where people tried to vote as to whether या not to include Elsa and Anna ( unofficial) alongside the rest of the Official DPs. Most people voted to keep them in here, because they happened to be their most प्रिय "princesses." And that was that. And I went back to what I had been doing. I just learned to see and don't see. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना Sparklefairy375 said…
I think Maleficent have better storyline than Sleeping Beauty.
-The reason why Maleficent curse Aurora more makes sense. She curse her because her revenge with Aurora's father who betray her, it was more acceptable rather than in the original one, which she curse her only because she wasn't invited to the party.Ridiculous.
-Maleficent isn't thoroughly evil. She feels guilty to curse Aurora after she supervise her for 16 years and realize that she is innocent and she doesn't deserve that curse. It's more realistic and shown human nature, which wasn't fully good or evil.
-The meaning of true love in Maleficent is more universal. Aurora was awaken after Maleficent kiss her brow, represent her motherly-like love with her. In original one the curse was broken with Philip kiss her, which Aurora met only around one day. I know it's a fairytale, but I just think it was unrealistic.
last edited एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
wavesurf commented…
I agree with you, at least partially. I enjoy both, but for different reasons. But I do think the Maleficent from 1959 sucked. She had all the ferocity and evilness of cardboard. At least, in the remake, Maleficent was no longer a one-sided figure. Maleficent 2014 showed that a fractured version of the fairy tale can be good, too. But I do like the original movie, as well. As I said, I enjoy both of them, but for different reasons. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
anukriti2409 commented…
i like both the movies. I like seeing Maleficent with humane side and i liked seeing her as pure evil too. I mostly enjoy the original और for the परियों and the fairytale look and feel than the storyplot. I like Maleficent for its magnificent एनीमेशन and well thought storyplot. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
xanara commented…
Trash opinions. Maleficent was garbage! एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Sparklefairy375 commented…
^Disagreement is fine, but please don't use offensive words. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना disnerdtobe said…
I feel like eventually there's gonna be a backlash for the character Moana. Everyone loves her now and people like her cause she's amazing. They like her cause her amazing-ness is still fresh in people's minds. But Disney pretty much always make likable characters and sometimes seeing a DP movie again reminds you why you like the character. But I feel like eventually after the hype dies down people will start seeing the flaws in her character or forget about her or realize that they still like some of the other DPs better.
last edited एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
anukriti2409 commented…
its quite true. I never really got to the point of loving her. I liked her. But i know like Poca, she's going to be hanging in the middle of my प्रिय list, if she becomes a DP, because she just strike me anything special. She's rehash of few पूर्व DPs - Ariel, Rapunzel and Poca. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Sparklefairy375 commented…
Everyone loves her for now becuse she's totally new. She's good but nothing new from her, imo. Like Anukriti कहा she's a mix of some पूर्व DPs, mostly Ariel and Pocahontas. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
MissCinico commented…
That's bound to happen with anything new that comes out, there's no doubt some people (if not the majority of people) will, but I won't. I tend to consistently like and care for a movie/character that I find appealing though of course my excitement will go down eventually. आप can only be hype for something for so long. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना Sparklefairy375 said…
Most peoples often said both Cars and Cars 2 are considered as worst Pixar movies, and only created for appealing little boys, but I enjoy to watch them ^.^ Though I admit the story of Cars 2 is kinda forced to be a secret agent story instead of the racing.
last edited एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
cruella commented…
I प्यार both of them, even if they do have their flaws. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना deedragongirl said…
How Far I'll Go has more motivational lyrics than Let It Go upon recently listening to it again.
anukriti2409 commented…
i agree. Let it go 2nd para is so overly filled with ice metaphors that it kills the mood entirely. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Sparklefairy375 commented…
Yeah, now I slightly like How Far I'll Go better than Let it Go. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना anukriti2409 said…
I find Anna's hair is more beautiful than Elsa's.
disnerdtobe commented…
YES. That's what I've been saying. At least Anna has really cute hairstyles like her pigtails and coronation bun. And I like the color too. Elsa's hair is just boring in comparison. Just one braid and the whitish color makes the texture seem plasticy and rough. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
disnerdtobe commented…
Also I don't think ur opinion is THAT unpopular. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
MalloMar commented…
It is really pretty. :) I remember predicting before the movie came out that people would start bleaching a strand of their hair like Anna, but I was wrong there... haha. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना deedragongirl said…
Okay, this is my brother's opinion and on the behalf of him, he thinks that Frozen is 10 times better than Moana.
xanara commented…
That is only half true. फ्रोज़न is 5x better than Moana. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना cruella said…
This is a copy and paste of a confession from CAMH forum.

I'm sure that I'm going to get a lot of hate for this one, but it's a confession I've been meaning to make for a while. I don't understand this trend among Disney fans, especially ones who don't like the villains, to claim that Cruella is THE most evil (not just Disney) villain ever because of her animal cruelty. Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to excuse her, or say that she's a nice person by any means. But really, when I just compare her to other Disney villains I can think of serval that come across a more evil then she does. I'm mean you've got Frollo, who wanted to kill a whole race of people, Shan-Yu, who enjoyed torturing people, The Evil Queen, who tried to kill out of envy.

If somebody's going to say that animal cruelty is their main reason for claiming that she's the most evil, okay that's their opinion and I respect it. I do have a question though, why isn't Edgar from the Aristo Cats so evil, I mean he poisons cats, steals them, and leaves them to die for money? But when ever I've mentioned him everybody just seems to like him, and not be bothered by his animal, because 'he's funny". Like I said, I respect everyone's opinion but some constancy and reasons for those opinions would be nice.

Sorry for the rant I just had to get that off my chest.
disnerdtobe commented…
Scar is also really evil, the most evil, I would say. He killed his own BROTHER. Sorry but someone, even a villain, who kills a family member just crosses the line for me. Even though I प्यार puppies, killing your own brother is just a lower tier of evil that’s just completely unacceptable imo. That's the one minor flaw that bugs me about Lion King. It was modeled off Shakespeare's play, which makes sense since even though I'm a huge प्रशंसक of TLM, I never liked Shakespeare. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
cruella commented…
Yeah, I agree with आप about Scar. While I do think killing पिल्लें is evil, I just don't think Cruella is quite as evil as a lot of people think, especially since she tried to fix her फर addiction in the sequel. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना cruella said…
Sorry to make two posts in row.

This is a copy and paste of a confession on CAMH forum

Here's an unpopular opinion I've been meaning to make for a while. I'm sick of this trend among DuckTales fans of absolutely demonizing Launchpad to make Scrooge look good and excuse his harsh behavior. Of course he's been accused of being a reverse snob for a while, but now they're claiming that he's a leech and gold digger, is too stupid to live, and does nothing but cause problems.

First of all: A rerseve snob is someone who looks down on a another person for being better off than they are. Nothing in Launchpad's personality would indicate that he's that way. The one minor incident that always mention is what is supposed to be an awkward moment where he says Scrooge can get away with wearing a weird looking outfit because he's rich.

As far a him being a leech and gold digger, again, where in his personality does it hint that he's like that? He definitely isn't shown trying to sweet talk Scrooge into giving him money, unlike Huey, Dewey and Louie. In the episode Launchpad first crash he's shown lowering his flying fee for Scrooge because he was desperate for a costumer, and hasn't asked for any raises in all the years they worked together.

And as far as him being too stupid to live and doing nothing but causing problems, you're partially right. Yes he is arguably "stupid", and clumsy because he's the comic relief, which does sometimes cause problems. But he's also very competent in other areas and saves the day sometimes, like in the episodes Top Duck, and Where No Duck Has Gone Before. Also he's not the only character whose flaws have caused problems for the group. Scrooge's greed and temper, and Huey, Dewey and Louie's irresponsibly have also cause problems.

You guys all know how much I adore Scrooge, so take it from me, demonizing his friends doesn't excuse his flaws.
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना KataraLover said…
I'm honestly not too surprised when people don't refer to Aurora by her actual name and just call her Sleeping Beauty. This is probably because of my personal opinion, but I think it's because she is one of the most forgettable protagonists in Disney history. Yes, they do say her name constantly in the first song (Hail to the Princess Aurora) but how many people do you know that are humming that song like they do Once Upon A Dream? If it wasn't for the Disney Princess franchise she'd likely be completely forgotten. People usually think about the Three Good Fairies and Maleficent when they hear about Sleeping Beauty but not Aurora. Also, a reason for little kids who probably don't remember her name likely don't know whether to call her Aurora or Briar Rose (or Rose for short) because she's more often called that than she is Aurora in the movie. I think it's because she's just not very memorable as a character that people call her Sleeping Beauty and not Aurora. I mean, people know Ariel and call her by her name and don't call her The Little Mermaid. Why? Because even if you like Aurora more, you can't deny that Ariel is a more memorable character. There are characters I like more than others but still admit that they aren't as memorable as certain characters I don't like. I DESPISE Peter Pan but I know he's more memorable than say Taran from The Black Cauldron. But this is all just my opinion.
Sparklefairy375 commented…
I completely agree with you. That's why Aurora is considered as 'false' protagonist, as she didn't much memorable like three good परियों या Maleficent. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना deedragongirl said…
I prefer the animated version of Peter Pan over the 2003 version!
disnerdtobe commented…
The animated version is superior. No one can beat the classic! एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
KataraLover commented…
I honestly think the animated Peter Pan is awful! The characters are either bland या annoying, it's really dated, it's racist, it's sexist, and is BORING! Even Walt डिज़्नी himself कहा he didn't like the movie and particularly hated Peter Pan himself. The 2003 version has और charm to it, was better at balancing Hook as both funny and menacing, the characters (even Pan) were और likable, it wasn't racist या sexist, and Pan would be called out on his crap and have it just seen as charming while also being shown as और human. I also think that the sequel to the डिज़्नी movie, Return to Neverland is SUPERIOR to the original animated movie as well for the same reasons. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
KataraLover commented…
I especially प्यार how it shows how hard it is to hold onto childhood and Jane's struggle is understandable. Plus she's a very entertaining and likable character. She'll actually call both Pan and टिंकर बेल out on the crap instead of being like her mother who would just take what Pan's crap (Even when she tries to call him out on it, it's not long enough for him to noticed. Jane makes sure he notices) या when टिंकर बेल tried to kill her told Pan to दिखाना mercy (NO ONE, ESPECIALLY A CHILD, IS THAT KIND)! Sorry for the rant, but just my opinion. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Sparklefairy375 commented…
I'm neutral towards the animated version, but the 2003 one is awful for me. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना Sparklefairy375 said…
I'm actually fine with the "twist-villain" type that Disney use in some of their current movies (King Candy/Turbo, Hans, Yokai/Callaghan, and Bellwether). They brings more surprise with the audiences. The one who we expected to be good, is actually evil. Though I agree if Disney seems to be a bit overused with this type of villain.
last edited एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
disnerdtobe commented…
I completely agree with you. I haven't seen King कैन्डी या Yokai (don't tell me which फिल्में they're from - spoiler alert) but I do appreciate these types of villains because they're representative of real life. In the real world, the villains aren't gonna have a warning sign with black, dark mist all around them, unfortunately. They're often the ones who are so charming and likable. I do agree they're a bit overused and seeing them in several फिल्में in a row wasn't a smart marketing move. It'd be better if they'd scatter them around a bit. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना Sparklefairy375 said…
I don't see how Belle is snob and rude. Yes, she seems to a bit snob with the villagers, but that's just because she dislike the villagers that pretend her and her father to be freaks towards her father's job as inventor and Belle's loving with books. She might be seems a bit stubborn with refuse Beast's offering to a dinner and leave him alone after he gets mad with her. But again, that's because she didn't like the rude Beast and she's scary with him. It's pretty understandable. A lot of peoples who dislike Belle often said this and it upset me.
wavesurf commented…
^Mmm. Just learn to ignore it? I don't know what else to tell you. I loved Belle's brown shoes when I was growing up, but I didn't really प्यार her snide remarks to Gaston, to the Beast, to Cogsworth ( whom I really liked) etc. When I was really little, I found Belle rather boring because she didn't go on "an adventure" at all exactly.... She stayed right in the neighborhood. Belle just got herself captured, and then stayed with her captor, and then प्यार "happened" and magically turned him back into a human. As I got older, and rewatched the movie, I realized that Belle was irritating to me for being a blander version of Jo from Little Women. But if this bothers you, I could equally say that people dislike Ariel and routinely call her rude, selfish, and inconsiderate. The most fervent Ariel haters fume about the fact that to them "Ariel doesn't deserve her happy ending," "she never learns a lesson, blah, blah,blah," "Ariel doesn't apologize," etc. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
wavesurf commented…
@Sparklefairy: Just type "hatred of Ariel" into any internet खोजिए engine. I guarantee you'll see pages of "hits." Same with Cinderella. Unfortunately, for both, hatred for them is great and it's widespread. Too bad, they're really close to my heart. *sighs* एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
disnerdtobe commented…
@sparklefairy I know right?? Thankfully there's a lot less सिंडरेला hate on fanpop, which is why I'm on here XD but if आप go anywhere else on the internet (*cough cough buzzfeed cough cough*) you'll see plenty of DP hatred (except of the ones who are considered "feminist" enough like मूलन या Merida. I'm just really grateful that the classic DPs get the respect that they deserve here on fanpop. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना KataraLover said…
WARNING: This turned out longer than I expected it to be and I know people will disagree with me... Well... Mainly the Frozen fans.

I think that The Princess and the Frog objectively has a better soundtrack than Frozen. What do I mean by that? Well, first of all, before I explain, let's forget how Frozen's soundtrack has been EVERYWHERE in the past. Also, I don't hate or dislike Frozen, it's MAJORLY overrated but good. The reason The Princess and the Frog's soundtrack is better is that it suits the style of its movie better than Frozen's songs do with its movie. It's set in New Orleans and the instrumental style is jazz and not just that, Dig A Little Deep has a gospel style to it, which is popular among the black community. Ray's song with his family fits with the Cajun style that is known in the Louisiana bayou and is used to help to help guide our heroes through this strange world (especially after Louis got them lost). Even the short opening of The Evening Star fits in with the concept of wishing on stars in the movie. They're a lot of fun and personally got me invested into the movie because they sucked me into New Orleans and its musical style.

Frozen's songs are great too (With two or three exceptions) but I think the musical style didn't fit the movie. I don't feel like the instrumental style is too modern or poppy like a lot of people do. The great songs felt like the typical timeless instrumental music you'd hear in fairy-tale movies and I think it's the kind of instrumental style that Tangled's song should've had (Except for the reprise of Mother Knows Best). However, it missed a HUGE opportunity to have the songs use a more Scandinavian style in its instrumental style. Like when the song opens up with a choir singing, which they also use when Elsa brings back summer and even do something similar when Elsa is crowned Queen and we see an actual choir sing. That was great and it would've worked better if the songs had that style.

The songs that aren't great, in my opinion, are Reindeers Are Better Than People, In Summer, and Fixer Upper. They really don't fit into the movie AT ALL! The reindeer song doesn't add anything in terms of story, is too short, doesn't have Jonathan Groff live up to his vocal talent, and the style is more of the pop guitar music that we got in Tangled (In the songs, anyway). In Summer is cute but doesn't really feel like it should belong in the movie but more in a Winnie the Pooh movie or something where the songs are mainly cute and fun. Fixer Upper, ignoring that the trolls are basically encouraging adultery and ignoring the seriousness of Anna's situation, is a very flawed song in quite a few ways. It's just used to force Anna and Kristoff to fall in love and make it seem even more out of nowhere, it's an odd choice to have as the last song in the movie, feels more like filler, and the gospel style REALLY doesn't fit. It worked with Dig a Little Deeper because of how gospel is popular in the black community and in New Orleans. It also worked in Hercules because gospel because of how the gospel songs were only sung by the Muses (Who I think were black, could be wrong) and they're goddesses, therefore it makes sense for them to sing a style that is used in churches, has a heavenly feeling, and goes with one of the themes of the movie (Immortality). Here it doesn't really fit at all.

I also think the songs in The Princess and the Frog transition better. Even when I fell in love with Frozen the first time I saw it (Before noticing its flaws after my second or third viewing before the hype for it went INSANE) I felt like the songs didn't transition very well. I felt like maybe they could've used the instrumental music to transition better. Like with Let It Go, when Anna leaves and we see nothing but a crazy snow storm before we get to Elsa at The North Mountain, we get the a kind of Scandinavian instrumental style music but then out of nowhere a Broadway-style instrumental music comes to have Elsa sing Let It Go. The song is amazing, but the transition didn't feel natural like with The Princess and the Frog. The songs in The Princess and the Frog managed to transition better because all of the music in the movie (Even when there aren't any songs) always keeps its style the same, so the transitions are more flowing. It never felt out of nowhere or that it didn't fit with the movie. They helped move the story along too.

Frozen's songs did move the story along too (the great ones), although the reprise of For the First Time in Forever felt kind of forced in certain ways. Like how some lines kind of shoved things down our throats like "There's so much fear!" (No sh*t Ms. Einstein). Also, I feel like the song Life's Too Short would've fit the situation better because it has Elsa confident and not afraid of her powers anymore, instead of contradicting the Let It Go scene, and moves the story along better as well as showing Anna and Elsa acting more like real sisters. But again, even that song should've had its instrumental style fit more the Scandinavian style and just let Tangled have its songs have the Broadway-style music.

I know the post is REALLY LONG and it's likely NO ONE will read all of it, let alone comment, but it's my opinion. But I do promise I didn't mean for this to end up being so long!
deedragongirl commented…
Considering that I'm फ्रोज़न fan, I have to agree with everything on what आप say! Although I have the फ्रोज़न soundtrack on my iPod and surprise, surprise. I hardly listen to it! एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Sparklefairy375 commented…
Well, the soundtrack in फ्रोज़न only works best in Let it Go (maybe I'm a little bit biased here) and Vuelie. The others, not really so, some of them are kinda cheesy. But I'm still not a प्रशंसक of TPATF soundtrack much. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
wavesurf commented…
I just don't think either soundtrack was good. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
ApplesauceDoctr commented…
आप make fair points and I liked seeing your perspective. I'll make one argument in favor of Fixer Upper though. It's not my प्रिय song, but in it the trolls suggest to Anna that दिखा रहा है another person love, though it won't "change" them, can open their eyes. And that's what she does later for Elsa. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना coolsinger198 said…
Pocahontas is the bravest Disney princess.
wavesurf commented…
I consider Pocahontas ONE of the bravest princesses डिज़्नी has, but not "the bravest." एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना Sparklefairy375 said…
I think The Lion King is overrated.
wavesurf commented…
^Why? It's well-loved just like Frozen. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
Sparklefairy375 commented…
Well, The Lion King was praised so much द्वारा most of the fans, and it brings the impact for the हाल का डिज़्नी movies, which often compared with it, आप see, the words like "the best one since The Lion King". However I find it just okay. Maybe it's just my different taste. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
ApplesauceDoctr commented…
I was never a *huge* प्रशंसक of the Lion King either. I do think it's good, and I get why people like it, but it's just not one of the ones I प्यार most. I completely get what you're saying. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना cruella said…
angry
Okay, get ready for a big rant! I know I'm pretty much the only Jar Jar Binks fan on the planet but I've gotta get this off my chest, because I'm REALLY MAD about what Disney decided to do with him. I can't believe they decided to make his official fate being banished for a second time and reduced to a street preformer! The author of the book says that he did it to represent real life, with adults hating him and kids loving him. Even if that was what he was doing there are much better ways to have done it than this. I know that he's unpopular but Disney is so much better than this, especially since they started to develop out just the comic relief. This honestly just feels like a giant slap in the face to all Jar Jar fans, almost like they're telling us we don't deserve to be Star Wars fans. I haven't been this mad at Disney in a long time.
last edited एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
wavesurf commented…
I didn't प्यार The Force Awakens. i thought it WAS the worst तारा, स्टार Wars movie out of the whole lot. I did like Rogue One. I was never that into Jar Jar, but तारा, स्टार Wars ( as a whole) has gone tepid and has लॉस्ट its steam since डिज़्नी "bought" the franchise. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना disnerdtobe said…
I don't think there's anything wrong with liking a movie because of nostalgia. It's just a movie. If nostalgia makes you like a movie better, then good for you. No one can tell you what you can or can not like. It's all subjective anyway. I was gonna add this to my unpopular opinions poll but I forgot to hehe.
Sparklefairy375 commented…
I agree. I often liking movies/tv shows for nostalgia. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
wavesurf commented…
Agreed. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
एक साल  से अधिक पुराना Sparklefairy375 said…
Idk if this is really an unpopular opinion or not, but just share this.

I'm glad to see the classic princesses are way more praised in Fanpop rather than anywhere else. Since join Fanpop for 2 years ago and start to active on this club, I start to like the classic princesses more. Before join Fanpop I think they're weak, boring, lame, and nothing more than princesses from childhood. But this club change my narrow-mind perspective.

After analyze more, I find the classic princesses are NOT weak or lame like most peoples are judged them. They shown their strengths and their charm. They might be not physically a strong badass like Mulan or Merida, but they're emotionally are strong. Snow White is an optimist and always trying to think positive even in bad situations. Cinderella is kind and always stay strong even after she was treated badly by her stepfamily. Aurora, though she has lack screen time in her movie, shown elegance, grace, caring, and responsibilities. They definitely can be good role models, especially for little girls.

So I'm getting confuse how anyone can hate such a sweet and kind princesses like them? Because they didn't represent the current females for generally? It was really a nonsense reason, the princesses and their films are set on 1800s, so I think their personality are represent the females in that eras.
last edited एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
disnerdtobe commented…
Totally agree, you're preaching the choir, sister! The classics are awesome. In fact they're too awesome that they became popular, and whenever something gets too popular, they get attacked. Faulty feminism and activists have people believe that these princesses are bad for little girls, when in fact, I think they're absolutely essential in forming good morals and happiness in little girls. It's sad they get too much hate. There was a lot of politics involved with people making false accusations about these characters and spreading them around so people believe them. I'm not bashing femenism. I'm bashing misguided, faulty "feminists" who think these princesses are unfeminist, but in actuality, these princesses are VERY feminist and ahead of their time. सिंडरेला and Snow are actually quite assertive even though they're still princessy and girly (nothing wrong with that!) and even if Aurora is a bit passive, the परियों are very badass and strong females. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
disnerdtobe commented…
From what I heard, there was politics, and entertainment companies trying to bash these popular, older female characters to promote their own as being "better". I don't know the whole story but that's what I'm sensing. एक साल  से अधिक पुराना
MalloMar commented…
*Applause* एक साल  से अधिक पुराना